Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems Exam PEGAPCSSA87V1 Topic 8 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 8
[All PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions]

A global application with infrastructure nodes located throughout the world requires certain operations to start executing at midnight GMT.

Select two possible designs for this use case. (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Craig
2 months ago
That's a good point, using the Queue-For-Processing method could help ensure the operations start executing at midnight GMT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
2 months ago
I agree with Selma. B and D are the way to go. Gotta have that dedicated queue processor to keep things running smoothly across all those different time zones.
upvoted 0 times
Juliann
25 days ago
User1: Definitely, it's important for efficiency and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
26 days ago
User3: Agreed, it helps ensure operations run smoothly across different time zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, having a dedicated queue processor is key for global applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
1 months ago
User1: I think B and D are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and option C are better choices because they involve using the Queue-For-Processing method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
3 months ago
Ha! Midnight GMT, huh? Sounds like a real nightmare for the poor dev who has to deal with that. I'd go with B and D, just to make sure those global operations don't keep the rest of us up all night.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was thinking A and C would work better. A standard queue processor should be able to handle this use case, and the Run in background step seems more straightforward than a dedicated queue processor.
upvoted 0 times
Brittney
2 months ago
Let's go with A and C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I agree, the Run in background step seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
2 months ago
I think A and C would work well. A standard queue processor should handle this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Craig
3 months ago
I think option A and option D could work well for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
3 months ago
I think B and D are the correct options. Using a dedicated queue processor with the Queue-For-Processing method and the Run in background step in the case life cycle seems like the best way to handle the global operations starting at midnight GMT.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
2 months ago
It's important to choose the right design to ensure the operations start executing at the specified time without any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
Yes, having a dedicated queue processor along with the Run in background step will help manage the global operations effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
2 months ago
I think using a dedicated queue processor will ensure the operations run smoothly at midnight GMT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
2 months ago
I agree, B and D seem like the most suitable options for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77