Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PeopleCert Exam ITIL-4-Transition Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL-4-Transition exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All ITIL-4-Transition Questions]

An organization wants to introduce a new service. There are many teams that will contribute to the design, development and transition of the service. Which approach should the organization follow when creating a value stream for this new service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alonso
2 months ago
Haha, option D is like trying to build a house by having each worker do their own thing. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
2 months ago
Option D? Really? Separate value streams for each team? That's just asking for chaos and a lack of coordination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
2 months ago
I agree with Kerry. Option A is the best choice to ensure a cohesive and effective introduction of the new service.
upvoted 0 times
Jani
2 months ago
True, but having one value stream for each team might help them focus better on their objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
2 months ago
I see your point, but having separate value streams for each project phase could help us be more Agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
2 months ago
But what about option B? It ensures all dimensions are considered equally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
2 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. It gives us a complete view of the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
2 months ago
Option C is too focused on the individual project phases. We need to look at the bigger picture, not just the milestones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
3 months ago
Option B sounds too fragmented to me. We need to consider the entire system, not just the 'four dimensions' separately.
upvoted 0 times
Reed
22 days ago
I think having one value stream for each team could lead to better focus and alignment with their objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
26 days ago
Creating separate value streams for each phase might help in achieving milestones more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
29 days ago
I agree, focusing on the entire project with one value stream would provide a holistic view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
1 months ago
But having one value stream for each team could also help them focus better on their objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
2 months ago
Creating separate value streams for each phase might help us achieve milestones more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
2 months ago
I agree, we need to have a holistic vision of the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eliseo
3 months ago
I think creating separate value streams for every project phase would ensure agility and timely milestones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
I agree with Derrick, considering all 'four dimensions' equally is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe separate value streams for practices, people, tools and suppliers would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Having a single, end-to-end value stream will help the organization maintain a holistic vision of the new service.
upvoted 0 times
Tien
3 months ago
I think option A is the best approach as well. It will help ensure that all aspects of the project are considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
3 months ago
I agree, having a holistic vision is important for the success of the new service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I think we should create one value stream for the entire project.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77