PeopleCert Exam MOVF Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's MOVF exam

Question #: 85
Topic #: 2

[All MOVF Questions]

Which statement regarding Value Improving Proposals is FALSE?

AA Study can combine multiple Value Improving Proposals to form different scenarios

BA Study may generate multiple Value Improving Proposals with conflicting recommendations

COnly one Value Improving Proposal should be implemented per Study

DA Value Improving Proposal should be tested for sensitivity of estimated costs and benefits

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Angella at May 23, 2024, 08:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MOVF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Antonio

6 months ago

Ooh, tough one. I'm going with C as the false statement. Why limit yourself to just one proposal per study? Variety is the spice of life!

upvoted 0 times

Allene

5 months ago

I agree with both of you. Having multiple proposals and testing them all seems like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

5 months ago

I'm not so sure, I think D could also be false. Testing costs and benefits is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

5 months ago

I think C is the false statement too. It's good to have options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

6 months ago

Haha, I bet the answer is D. Anything involving 'sensitivity' is always a red flag in these exams!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

6 months ago

This is a tricky one, but I'd say B is the false statement. I've seen studies with multiple proposals that don't always align.

upvoted 0 times

Arlene

5 months ago

I've also seen studies with multiple proposals, it can be challenging to decide which one to implement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

5 months ago

I think you're right, it's important to test the costs and benefits of each proposal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corazon

6 months ago

I agree, it can be confusing when there are conflicting recommendations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

6 months ago

A is definitely true. Combining proposals to form different scenarios is a great way to evaluate the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

6 months ago

D seems like the correct answer. Sensitivity analysis is crucial to ensure the reliability of the estimated costs and benefits.

upvoted 0 times

Hester

5 months ago

That's true, we don't want conflicting recommendations from multiple proposals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veta

5 months ago

I think C is also important, so only one proposal is implemented at a time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clemencia

6 months ago

I agree, D is important to make sure the costs and benefits are accurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marta

6 months ago

I think option C is false. Implementing multiple Value Improving Proposals per study makes sense to explore different scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

Shawn

6 months ago

But wouldn't it be more efficient to focus on one proposal at a time?

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

6 months ago

But wouldn't implementing only one make it easier to track the results and impact?

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

6 months ago

I agree, implementing multiple proposals can help explore different options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silvana

6 months ago

I agree, having multiple Value Improving Proposals can provide a more comprehensive analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

6 months ago

I think option D is also important, testing for sensitivity is crucial for accurate cost and benefit estimation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

6 months ago

I agree, implementing multiple proposals can provide a more comprehensive analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...