Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PgMP Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All PgMP Questions]

A new component project is approved by the program governance board. The funding for this component project will be provided by an organization different from the organization funding the program.

Would this be an acceptable funding arrangement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carmen
2 months ago
D) What is this, communist Russia? No way the program and its projects should be tied to the same purse strings. B is the only answer that doesn't make me want to throw my laptop out the window.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
A) Nah, man. That's way too restrictive. Gotta keep those funding sources diverse, like a well-balanced portfolio. B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
19 days ago
B) Agreed, it allows for better risk management and resource allocation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
24 days ago
A) Exactly, having diverse funding sources is important for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
1 months ago
B) Yes, the program and its components may have different funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 months ago
A) For sure, it's like spreading out your investments for better stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 months ago
A) Yes, only component projects may have different funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
B) Definitely, having different funding sources can help mitigate risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
2 months ago
A) Yeah, I agree. It's important to have flexibility in funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
2 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards C, but B makes sense. Can't have the program and its projects all under the same wallet, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Rene
2 months ago
Vanesa: Definitely. It's better to keep things separate when it comes to funding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to have some separation to avoid potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 months ago
I think B is the right choice. It's okay for the program and its components to have different funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darnell
3 months ago
I disagree. I believe the program and the project should be funded by the same organization to ensure alignment and accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
3 months ago
I agree with Tegan. As long as the project gets funded, it shouldn't matter where the money comes from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
B) Definitely the right answer. It's common for a program to have different funding sources for its components. Keeps things flexible, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Ben
2 months ago
B) Yes, the program and its components may have different funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
B) Definitely the right answer. It's common for a program to have different funding sources for its components. Keeps things flexible, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
A) Yes, only component projects may have different funding sources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
3 months ago
I think it's okay for the component project to have a different funding source.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77