Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PgMP Topic 6 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PgMP exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 6
[All PgMP Questions]

A program manager takes over a global program from another program manager. Upon arriving on-site, the program manager immediately sees that stakeholders are upset, because of a lack of updates and communications about the program.

What should the program manager do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Danica
6 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to have a clear understanding of how stakeholders are being engaged and communicated with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
6 months ago
I would also suggest reviewing the program communications management plan and stakeholder register to ensure alignment with the overall communication strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
7 months ago
Yes, I agree. Understanding the current state of communication is key to addressing the stakeholders' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
7 months ago
I think the program manager should review the program governance plan and communication log first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
7 months ago
Wow, that sounds like a tough situation for the new program manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
8 months ago
Come on, you guys are overthinking this. The answer is clearly D - notify the exec sponsor and update the issue log. That's the fastest way to escalate and get some serious attention on this problem. Plus, the sponsor needs to know ASAP that this program is in trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
8 months ago
Ha, I bet the previous program manager was just sleeping on the job. Probably spending more time on the golf course than keeping stakeholders informed. But I digress, I think C is the way to go - review the stakeholder engagement plan and matrix. That'll give you the most insight into who's upset and why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
8 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go. You need to understand the existing communication and stakeholder strategies before you can start fixing the issues. Jumping right into notifying the sponsor without that context could actually make things worse. Gotta do your homework first.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
7 months ago
Correct, getting a clear picture first is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
7 months ago
Taking time to review the plans could prevent further misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
8 months ago
You're right, proper planning and analysis are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
8 months ago
It's important to assess the situation before taking any actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
8 months ago
Absolutely, diving in without that knowledge is a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
8 months ago
In agreement with B. Understanding the current strategies is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
8 months ago
B) Review the program communications management plan and stakeholder register.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
8 months ago
Wow, this question really hits the nail on the head. As a program manager, I know how crucial communication and stakeholder management are. I'd lean towards B - reviewing the communication plan and stakeholder register. That's the fastest way to get up to speed on the situation and address the stakeholders' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77