Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-PBA Topic 6 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 6
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

The following requirement was included in a business requirements document: "An API shall be built to send data back and forth from the accounting system to the customer relationship system so that name and address data can be synchronized." What should be done with this business requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elza
6 months ago
I see your point, But I think option D should also be considered. It explains the reason behind the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best choice. It clearly states the type of data and the source system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
6 months ago
I agree with Option A is the way to go. It provides important details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
7 months ago
I think option B is correct. The requirement is too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
7 months ago
I see your point, Eura. But I think option D should also be considered. It explains the reason behind the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
7 months ago
I agree with Darnell. Option A is the way to go. It provides important details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
7 months ago
I disagree, Gwenn. I believe option A is the best choice. It clearly states the type of data and the source system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
7 months ago
I think option B is correct. The requirement is too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think the requirement is actually pretty clear on what the business need is - they need to synchronize customer data between two systems. The API part is just one way to do that, but maybe there are other options too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you guys. This requirement is too prescriptive. It's like they want us to build a custom API, but that might not be the most efficient or cost-effective solution. We should definitely revise it to be more open-ended.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
8 months ago
A) It should remain because it specifies the type of data and the source system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
8 months ago
B) It should be revised because it states a solution to the problem rather than the business need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
8 months ago
I agree, the requirement as written is too solution-oriented. We need to step back and really understand what the underlying business problem is that needs to be solved. Once we have that, we can figure out the best technical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
8 months ago
Hmm, this requirement seems a bit too specific. It's telling us how to solve the problem rather than what the actual business need is. I think option B is the way to go - we should revise it to focus on the business need rather than the technical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77