A business analyst is documenting the acceptance criteria to suppon a minor modification in a user portal The analyst submits the criteria for review, but it is deemed incomplete and returned.
What could have caused the documentation to be returned?
Haha, good one! Yeah, I could see that happening. The analyst probably thought they were being innovative, but the old-school review team wasn't having it.
Hey, maybe the analyst got a little too creative and tried to use user stories instead of a traditional requirements doc. That would definitely not fly with the reviewers!
I agree, the question is a bit ambiguous. The analyst could have failed to include key details like the specific scope of the modification or the user requirements. That would definitely cause the documentation to be returned.
This seems like a straightforward question, but I'm a little worried about the wording. The acceptance criteria should be clear and comprehensive, so I'm not sure why it would be returned as incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Detra
5 months agoFranchesca
5 months agoFelicitas
5 months agoKristin
5 months agoFranchesca
5 months agoClemencia
5 months agoDiane
5 months agoVincenza
5 months agoClemencia
7 months agoDiane
7 months agoClemencia
7 months agoElvis
8 months agoZita
8 months agoKasandra
8 months agoGeraldine
7 months agoJosephine
7 months agoVallie
7 months agoGerald
8 months agoKimbery
8 months agoGladis
8 months agoLuisa
8 months agoDaren
8 months agoBenedict
8 months ago