Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMI-PBA Topic 8 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 8
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

The business analyst has completed the requirements gathering and documentation processes in developing a baseline document. Several signoffs are needed. During the joint review process with the key stakeholders, the stakeholders announce that they are still not ready to sign off due to a communication gap.

Which technique should the business analyst have followed to ensure consensus?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, one of the techniques to ensure consensus among stakeholders is to conduct a pre-review of the requirements with the key stakeholders before the formal review meeting. This can help to identify and resolve any issues, gaps, or conflicts that may arise during the meeting. A pre-review can also help to build trust and rapport with the stakeholders, and increase their confidence and commitment to the requirements. A pre-review can be done through interviews, workshops, surveys, or other methods of communication.References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content:PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list:PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide:Study.com


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jaclyn
5 days ago
I'm going with option B. The business analyst should have done a complete review with the stakeholders beforehand. That's like Requirements Gathering 101.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
10 days ago
I disagree. I think the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting directly to address any communication gaps in real-time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 days ago
Nah, the business analyst should have invited the key stakeholders to the meeting. How else were they supposed to sign off on the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
20 days ago
I agree with you, Leonard. It's important to involve the key stakeholders in the review process to ensure their buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
21 days ago
The business analyst should have reviewed the requirements with the key stakeholders before the meeting. That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Stephane
2 days ago
A) The business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
24 days ago
I think the business analyst should have performed a complete review of each requirement with the key stakeholders prior to the meeting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77