Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI Exam PMP Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's Project Management Professional (2024) exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 2
[All Project Management Professional (2024) Questions]

By the end of the first sprint, a project lead notices that one of the team members is not performing very well. Which form of communication should the

project lead use to handle the situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

: According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 368, communication can be classified into formal and informal, written and verbal, and vertical and horizontal, depending on the context, purpose, and audience of the message. Informal verbal communication, such as a conversation, is a type of communication that is spontaneous, casual, and flexible, and that can be used to exchange information, ideas, opinions, or feedback in a timely and direct manner. Informal verbal communication is suitable for handling a situation where a team member is not performing very well, as it can allow the project lead to express concern, empathy, and support, as well as to identify the root causes of the poor performance, and to explore possible solutions or improvements. Informal verbal communication can also help to maintain a positive and trusting relationship between the project lead and the team member, and to avoid any misunderstanding, resentment, or demotivation that may arise from more formal or written communication.Reference:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 368

Free PMP Practice Exam Questions - 120 Sample Test Questions


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tracey
8 days ago
I disagree, I think informal verbal communication would be more effective in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
11 days ago
Ha! Reminds me of that time I had to give feedback to a teammate. Went with the 'informal written communication' - a Post-it note under their desk. Didn't go over too well, but at least I tried, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
13 days ago
I agree with Latanya, a conversation at the end of the sprint retrospective would be appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
13 days ago
Option D seems like the easiest approach, but I worry it might not be taken as seriously. A friendly conversation could work, but I'd lean more towards a formal discussion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
18 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C might be better - a formal written communication with the manager in the loop could help document the situation and ensure it's addressed properly.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
2 days ago
User 1: I think option C is a good idea, it's important to have a record of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alesia
19 days ago
I think the project lead should go with option B. A formal verbal communication in the sprint retrospective would be the most effective way to address the issue directly and provide feedback in a constructive manner.
upvoted 0 times
Eva
7 days ago
Having a conversation at the sprint retrospective would provide an opportunity for open dialogue and feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 days ago
A friendly reminder through informal written communication might not address the issue effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
11 days ago
I think option C might be too formal and could escalate the situation unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
12 days ago
I agree, option B would allow for a direct and professional conversation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latanya
27 days ago
I think the project lead should use formal verbal communication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77