Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRINCE2 Exam PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Topic 1 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 1
[All PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Questions]

Which statement about quality tolerances for a product is CORRECT in an agile context?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Willard
4 months ago
Quality tolerances in an agile world? Might as well ask a unicorn to juggle flaming chainsaws.
upvoted 0 times
Jutta
3 months ago
Quality criteria should have zero tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
3 months ago
Setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
A) All quality criteria tolerance must be fixed? Nah, that's way too rigid for agile. Not a chance.
upvoted 0 times
Alfred
3 months ago
A) All quality criteria tolerance must be fixed? No way, that's not agile at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
3 months ago
B) Quality tolerances should be the same for all quality criteria
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
C) Setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lovetta
4 months ago
I don't think so, having zero tolerance for all quality criteria might not be practical in an agile context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
But what about option D? Shouldn't all quality criteria have zero tolerance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
5 months ago
I agree with Kasandra, setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
5 months ago
B) Quality tolerances should be the same for all quality criteria? Sounds like a one-size-fits-all approach, which is the opposite of agile.
upvoted 0 times
Ulysses
4 months ago
C) That's right, quality tolerances should be based on the importance of each quality criteria
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
5 months ago
A) Setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
D) All quality criteria should have zero tolerance? Are they living in a dream world? That's not very agile at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
5 months ago
C) Setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria - this makes the most sense in an agile context where flexibility is key.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
4 months ago
It's all about being able to adjust and focus on what matters most in terms of quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
4 months ago
Definitely, having different tolerances for different quality criteria allows for adaptability in agile projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
4 months ago
Agreed, in agile context, flexibility is important so it makes sense to prioritize quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
4 months ago
I think C is the correct answer, setting quality tolerance relies on prioritising quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77