Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA Exam 8010 Topic 1 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRMIA's Operational Risk Manager (ORM) Exam exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 1
[All Operational Risk Manager (ORM) Exam Questions]

Which of the following is not a limitation of the univariate Gaussian model to capture the codependence structure between risk factros used for VaR calculations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the univariate Gaussian model, each risk factor is modeled separately independent of the others, and the dependence between the risk factors is captured by the covariance matrix (or its equivalent combination of the correlation matrix and the variance matrix). Risk factors could include interest rates of different tenors, different equity market levels etc.

While this is a simple enough model, it has a number of limitations.

First, it fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness. Second, a single covariance matrix is insufficient to describe the fine codependence structure among risk factors as non-linear dependencies or tail correlations are not captured. Third, determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases. The number of covariances increases by the square of the number of variables.

But an inability to capture linear relationships between the factors is not one of the limitations of the univariate Gaussian approach - in fact it is able to do that quite nicely with covariances.

A way to address these limitations is to consider joint distributions of the risk factors that capture the dynamic relationships between the risk factors, and that correlation is not a static number across an entire range of outcomes, but the risk factors can behave differently with each other at different intersection points.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dortha
9 days ago
Okay, so the univariate Gaussian model is like a blindfolded person trying to solve a Rubik's cube. It just ain't gonna work, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
18 days ago
I see your point, Kyoko. The model's lack of capturing non-linear dependencies is a big issue too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
20 days ago
Option C made me chuckle. Can't capture linear relationships? That's like saying a ruler can't measure straight lines. Come on, guys, let's get real here.
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
3 days ago
C) It cannot capture linear relationships between risk factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
5 days ago
B) Determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
7 days ago
A) The univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Solange
24 days ago
D is the correct answer. The single covariance matrix is about as useful as a chocolate teapot when it comes to capturing the complex relationships between risk factors. Non-linear dependencies? Tail correlations? Forget about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
25 days ago
That's true, but I still think the main limitation is the model's inability to capture the empirical distributions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
26 days ago
Determining the covariance matrix is a nightmare, especially when you have a ton of risk factors. It's like trying to herd cats, but with numbers instead of furry felines.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
7 days ago
B) Determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
9 days ago
A) The univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
1 months ago
The univariate Gaussian model is a joke when it comes to real-world risk factors. The fat tails and skewness? Come on, that's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
upvoted 0 times
Laura
10 days ago
D) A single covariance matrix is insufficient to describe the fine codependence structure among risk factors as non-linear dependencies or tail correlations are not captured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
11 days ago
B) Determining the covariance matrix becomes an extremely difficult task as the number of risk factors increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
15 days ago
A) The univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors, notably their fat tails and skewness.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 months ago
But what about option B? Determining the covariance matrix seems like a difficult task too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
1 months ago
I agree with Kyoko, the fat tails and skewness are not captured well by the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 months ago
I think the limitation is that the univariate Gaussian model fails to fit to the empirical distributions of risk factors.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77