Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

RSA Exam 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Topic 4 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for RSA's 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 4
[All 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions]

When an administrator selects to cascade private field permissions for a group, which of the following would be a valid result?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lachelle
2 months ago
I'm picking D, but honestly, who even comes up with these joke options B and C? 'Members would NOT have access' - yeah, right.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
26 days ago
Definitely, D is the safest option to ensure proper access for all group members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
29 days ago
Yeah, D seems like the most logical choice. It ensures that both the selected group and child groups have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 months ago
I know, it's pretty confusing. But I think D makes the most sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
1 months ago
I'm picking D, but honestly, who even comes up with these joke options B and C? 'Members would NOT have access' - yeah, right.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stanton
2 months ago
D all the way! Can't believe anyone would think the field access wouldn't cascade to child groups. That's like the whole point of this feature.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
2 months ago
B) Only members of the selected group would have access to the field, members of any child groups would NOT have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
D) Members of the selected group and members of any child groups would have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 months ago
A) Only members of BOTH the selected group and all child groups would have access to the field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ricarda
3 months ago
I see your point, Socorro. I also think the answer is D because it allows for broader access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
3 months ago
But if we cascade permissions, wouldn't it make sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'm going with D. Anything else would just be silly, right?
upvoted 0 times
Britt
2 months ago
Yes, D is the logical choice. It ensures that all relevant members can access the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
3 months ago
I agree, D is the correct option. It makes sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
3 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
3 months ago
Option D is clearly the correct answer. Cascading permissions should allow access to the field for both the selected group and any child groups.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
2 months ago
Yes, it makes sense that both the selected group and child groups should have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
2 months ago
Yes, that's right. It ensures that permissions are cascaded down effectively to all relevant groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
3 months ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer. It makes sense for both the selected group and child groups to have access to the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77