Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

RSA Exam 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Topic 5 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for RSA's 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 5
[All 050-6201-ARCHERASC01 Questions]

Historically, each area of a typical organization would manage its own risks. How does RSA Archer's Operational Risk Management solution area differ in approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Oliva
2 months ago
I believe option C is also important. Specialized dashboards can help prevent IT and business disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
3 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. Sending email notifications to all areas might create unnecessary panic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
3 months ago
I agree with Herminia. Having visibility to management is crucial for effective risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. It makes sense to have control over the complete risk life cycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
I see the value in option A, but I think option B could also be beneficial in promoting quick reactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
3 months ago
I prefer option C. Specialized dashboards can really help prevent disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
3 months ago
I agree with Bette. Option A seems to offer a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
3 months ago
Option C is all about dashboards and reports, but what about the actual risk management capabilities? I'll go with A, the complete package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
4 months ago
Option B sounds like a recipe for inbox overload. I'll stick with A, where I can get a holistic view of risk management.
upvoted 0 times
Brinda
3 months ago
I also prefer option A for a complete risk life cycle control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
Rikki is right, option A does provide a holistic view of risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
3 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like it could lead to inbox overload.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherrie
4 months ago
Option D is just ridiculous. A siloed approach? That's the opposite of what we're trying to achieve here. Haha, nice try!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
4 months ago
I like how Option A talks about the complete risk life cycle and improved governance. That's what we need in a good ORM solution.
upvoted 0 times
Corrina
2 months ago
Jaime: True, specialized dashboards and reports can provide valuable insights for managing risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Option C also seems important for reducing the risk of IT and business disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I agree, having control of the complete risk life cycle is crucial for effective risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
3 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice for improved governance and visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorathy
4 months ago
Option A seems to align with the concept of an integrated risk management approach. Nicely done!
upvoted 0 times
Pedro
3 months ago
I agree, having control of the complete risk life cycle is crucial for effective risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
4 months ago
Thanks! Yes, RSA Archer's ORM solution really helps in improving governance of risk management activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bette
4 months ago
I think option A is the best approach. It allows for better governance and visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77