SailPoint Exam IdentityIQ-Engineer Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SailPoint's IdentityIQ-Engineer exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 2

[All IdentityIQ-Engineer Questions]

The engineer is configuring a new application definition.

The customer wants an Audit record to be created with the error message, if provisioning fails.

Is this the rule an engineer should write to accomplish the goal?

Solution: Write an AfterProvisioning rule.

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

An AfterProvisioning rule in SailPoint IdentityIQ is typically used to execute custom logic after the provisioning process has been completed successfully. However, if provisioning fails, this rule will not be triggered because it is specifically designed for post-successful provisioning activities. To log an error message in the audit record when provisioning fails, a better approach would be to use a provisioning error handler or configure a specific workflow that captures errors and logs them accordingly. The AfterProvisioning rule is not the correct solution for this use case. Refer to the SailPoint IdentityIQ Provisioning and Workflow documentation for appropriate methods of handling provisioning errors and audit logging.

by Bonita at Aug 27, 2024, 09:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IdentityIQ-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Goldie

3 months ago

AfterProvisioning? Nah, that's like trying to fix a flat tire after the car's already in the ditch. 'ProvisioningFailureLogger' is where it's at!

upvoted 0 times

Leigha

1 months ago

Engineer: Let's go with ProvisioningFailureLogger then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hector

2 months ago

Customer: No, ProvisioningFailureLogger is better for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earnestine

2 months ago

Engineer: AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

3 months ago

In that case, the engineer should consider adding additional error handling logic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

3 months ago

But what if the provisioning fails before the AfterProvisioning rule is executed?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

3 months ago

I agree with Keshia, that rule should create an Audit record with the error message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keshia

3 months ago

I think the engineer should write an AfterProvisioning rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsay

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not convinced. Shouldn't we be using the 'ProvisioningErrorHandler' rule instead? Seems more appropriate for handling errors.

upvoted 0 times

Ty

3 months ago

Customer: No, I think the ProvisioningErrorHandler rule would be more appropriate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

3 months ago

Engineer: Yes, an AfterProvisioning rule should be written.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

3 months ago

No way, that's not the right rule. I'd go with the 'AfterProvisioningFailure' rule, much more specific to the task at hand.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

4 months ago

I agree, AfterProvisioning is the way to go. Gotta love those error messages, they're like the spice of life in IT!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

4 months ago

Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure. Seems straightforward to me.

upvoted 0 times

Leah

3 months ago

AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

3 months ago

Customer: Agreed, it will help track any issues that may arise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

3 months ago

That makes sense

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

3 months ago

Engineer: It's important to have that in place for auditing purposes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wenona

3 months ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

3 months ago

Customer: Seems straightforward to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucia

3 months ago

Engineer: Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure.

upvoted 0 times

...