Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SailPoint Exam IdentityIQ-Engineer Topic 7 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SailPoint's IdentityIQ-Engineer exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 7
[All IdentityIQ-Engineer Questions]

An engineer is developing an instance of IdentitylQ using the Services Standard Build (SSB) for a client. Is this a valid action the engineer can perform when setting up or using the SSB?

Solution: Place the patch jar file in the build's base/patch folder that matches the patch version the client is using

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Yes, this is a valid action. When using the Services Standard Build (SSB) in SailPoint IdentityIQ, placing the patch jar file in the build's base/patch folder is a correct procedure, provided the patch version matches what the client is using. This allows the build process to incorporate the patch into the deployment, ensuring that the correct versions and fixes are applied to the IdentityIQ instance.


SailPoint IdentityIQ Services Standard Build Guide

SailPoint IdentityIQ Patching and Version Management Guide

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bernardo
2 months ago
This question is a real identity crisis! But seriously, if the patch fits, you must acquit.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
29 days ago
No, the engineer cannot perform this action when setting up or using the SSB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 months ago
Yes, the engineer can place the patch jar file in the build's base/patch folder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
Wait, does this mean I have to actually understand what I'm doing? Ugh, engineering is hard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
2 months ago
Bingo! Putting the patch jar in the right folder is the way to go. Glad I read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Karl
28 days ago
Bingo! Putting the patch jar in the right folder is the way to go. Glad I read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keena
2 months ago
No, I disagree. The engineer should not place the patch jar file in the build's base/patch folder
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 months ago
I think it's a valid action because it matches the patch version the client is using
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
3 months ago
Yes, the engineer can place the patch jar file in the build's base/patch folder
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Doesn't the question mention 'setting up or using the SSB'? I'd double-check the documentation just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 months ago
I agree, it's always best to double-check the documentation before proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
2 months ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
3 months ago
Absolutely! That's the right way to apply patches in the SSB. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
2 months ago
Absolutely! That's the right way to apply patches in the SSB. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77