Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Advanced-Cross-Channel Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Advanced Cross Channel Accredited Professional exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Advanced Cross Channel Accredited Professional Questions]

You are using replace inbox message feature. But your audience has changed and some of the contacts who received the first message do not exist. What would happen?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Eden at Jan 23, 2024, 12:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Advanced-Cross-Channel Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Geoffrey
3 months ago
I bet the developers who wrote this question are having a good laugh at our expense. They're probably sitting in their cubicles, giggling like schoolchildren.
upvoted 0 times
Owen
2 months ago
B) the inbox message is replaced only for users who do not exist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
A) the inbox message is replaced for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
3 months ago
I'm stumped! How am I supposed to know if the message gets replaced for all users or just the non-existent ones? This question is a real head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with B. Replacing the message only for users who don't exist seems like the most logical option to me.
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
2 months ago
User 3: Agreed, it would be a waste of time to replace it for non-existent users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. No need to replace the message for users who don't exist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
2 months ago
Yeah, it's more efficient to only replace the message for users who are actually there to receive it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
2 months ago
Agreed, it would be a waste of time and resources to replace the message for non-existent users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
2 months ago
User 1: I think B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
3 months ago
I think B is the best option too. It wouldn't make sense to replace the message for users who don't exist.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. Why would we want to replace the message for users who don't exist? That just doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
3 months ago
Yeah, it wouldn't make sense to replace the message for users who don't exist.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77