Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ADX-271 Topic 4 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-271 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 4
[All ADX-271 Questions]

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) uses a third party to manage low-severity tickets using its legacy system. Sometimes, third-party agents have to create cases on behalf of UMS customers.

Which user licenses should the implementation practitioner recommend for third-party staff?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

This license type allows third-party staff to access cases, leads, opportunities, contracts, and custom objects on behalf of UMS customers. Partner Community users can also create cases from questions, escalate questions to cases, and view Knowledge articles. Partner Community users cannot access quotes or reports and dashboards.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Raina
2 months ago
As a professional, I must say that Customer Identity is the most appropriate choice. The question specifically mentions 'on behalf of UMS customers', so that's the license that aligns best with the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
2 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards Customer Community Plus, but Customer Identity could work too. Gotta keep those third-party folks on a tight leash, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Roosevelt
2 months ago
B) Customer Identity
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
2 months ago
A) Partner Community
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
3 months ago
Haha, Partner Community? Really? That's like giving the janitor the CEO's login credentials. Customer Community Plus is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
2 months ago
Exactly! Customer Community Plus is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
2 months ago
C) Customer Community Plus
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
2 months ago
Haha, Partner Community? Really? That's like giving the janitor the CEO's login credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
A) Partner Community
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brandon
3 months ago
Customer Identity seems like the most logical choice. It allows the third-party to act on behalf of UMS customers without granting them full community access.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
3 months ago
C) Customer Community Plus
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
3 months ago
B) Customer Identity
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
3 months ago
A) Partner Community
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
3 months ago
That's a good point, Eleonora. Partner community licenses offer more flexibility for third-party staff in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
3 months ago
But wouldn't customer community plus licenses be too restrictive for third-party agents creating cases on behalf of UMS customers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
4 months ago
I'm not so sure. I think customer community plus licenses could also work for third-party staff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
4 months ago
I think Customer Community Plus is the way to go. It gives third-party staff the necessary access to manage cases without going overboard.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
2 months ago
Yes, it provides the right level of access for managing cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
C) Customer Community Plus
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
I agree, Customer Community Plus seems like the best option for third-party staff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
3 months ago
D) Customer Community
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
3 months ago
C) Customer Community Plus
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
3 months ago
B) Customer Identity
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
3 months ago
A) Partner Community
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
4 months ago
I agree with Eleonora. Partner community licenses make sense for managing low-severity tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
4 months ago
I think partner community licenses are the way to go for third-party staff.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77