Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam ANC-201 Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ANC-201 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 2
[All ANC-201 Questions]

A customer has a dataset consisting of over 300 unique product names. They request a prediction model with the product names included.

Which action should the Einstein Consultant take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Flo
2 months ago
Option C is tempting, but I have a feeling that the default variables in the Product object won't be enough to get a good prediction model. Gotta go with A on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 months ago
Haha, this is a tough one. I bet the Einstein Consultant is just sitting there scratching their head, wondering how to tackle this monster dataset!
upvoted 0 times
Janet
1 months ago
B) Adjust the model to eliminate extreme values in the outcome variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
1 months ago
A) Split the analysis into multiple models will each having fewer products
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanja
3 months ago
I don't know, D seems like the way to go. Using SKU numbers instead of product names just makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
2 months ago
User 3: D does seem like a practical solution, it would simplify the prediction model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, it would be more efficient to use SKU numbers instead of product names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
User 1: I think D is a good idea, using SKU numbers would definitely make things clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
3 months ago
That's a good point, using SKU numbers would definitely increase clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
3 months ago
I suggest using SKU numbers instead of product names, that would simplify the model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
3 months ago
It might, but it will make it easier to handle a large number of unique product names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
3 months ago
Option A makes sense, splitting the analysis into multiple models would be more manageable with such a large dataset.
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
3 months ago
That's a good idea, it would definitely make the analysis more manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
3 months ago
A) Split the analysis into multiple models will each having fewer products
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
3 months ago
User 2: Agreed, splitting the analysis into multiple models will make it more manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the best approach for handling a dataset with over 300 unique product names.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
But wouldn't that increase complexity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
4 months ago
I think we should split the analysis into multiple models.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77