Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam B2B-Commerce-Developer Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B-Commerce-Developer exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All B2B-Commerce-Developer Questions]

What is one requirement to keep in mind when including additional JavaScript 1h files in a Lightning Web Component?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When including additional JavaScript files in a Lightning Web Component, it is required that these files are ECMAScript 6 (ES6) modules and have unique names within the component's folder. This ensures proper module resolution and avoids namespace conflicts. Salesforce LWC documentation provides guidelines on organizing component resources, including JavaScript modules, to ensure they are correctly recognized and utilized within the LWC framework.


by Quentin at Aug 07, 2024, 01:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2B-Commerce-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Vesta
4 days ago
I agree with Almeta, option A seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
7 days ago
Hah, 'singleton.js' - is that like the JavaScript version of a lonely hearts club or something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
7 days ago
I think the requirement is that the files must be ES6 modules and have unique names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
7 days ago
D? One file? Are you kidding me? How am I supposed to do anything with just one file? I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
17 days ago
I believe option D is incorrect because we can actually import multiple files in a Lightning Web Component.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
20 days ago
B? Only 5 files allowed? What is this, a free trial? I need more than that to build a proper LWC!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
23 days ago
C seems like a lot of work, having to import everything to a singleton file first. I'd rather just use A and keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
7 days ago
I always prefer to keep things simple when it comes to coding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
7 days ago
Yeah, option C seems like unnecessary extra steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
11 days ago
I agree, option A is definitely simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
27 days ago
A sounds like the right answer. Gotta keep those file names unique, you know? Wouldn't want any naming conflicts in my LWC!
upvoted 0 times
Melina
1 days ago
A sounds like the right answer. Gotta keep those file names unique, you know? Wouldn't want any naming conflicts in my LWC!
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
3 days ago
A) The files must be ES6 modules and must have names that are unique within the component's folder.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benedict
28 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work if all files are imported to a singleton.js file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 months ago
I agree with Marti, option A makes sense because it ensures proper organization and avoids conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
1 months ago
I think the requirement is that the files must be ES6 modules and have unique names.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77