Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2B Commerce Developer Topic 7 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B Commerce Developer exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 7
[All B2B Commerce Developer Questions]

A developer suspects recent edits to a checkout flow have created a bug based on flow errors being emailed. Given the emails and some inputs known to trigger the issue, which two activities should the developer consider in their investigation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

To investigate a suspected bug in a checkout flow, comparing previous versions of the flow with the current one can help identify changes that might have introduced the bug. Additionally, Salesforce provides debugging capabilities within the Flow Builder, where a developer can select the debug option, provide input values known to trigger the issue, and execute the flow to observe its behavior, aiding in pinpointing the source of the problem.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ludivina
2 months ago
I'm voting for B and D. Gotta love a good old-fashioned version comparison, but the live session is where the real magic happens. Fingers crossed the flow doesn't crash on us!
upvoted 0 times
Truman
1 months ago
Let's try both then. Hopefully we can pinpoint the bug and fix it quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 months ago
I agree, but I also think D is important. Attaching to a live session could help us see the issue in action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 months ago
I think B is a good idea. Comparing previous versions might give us some clues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
2 months ago
C is the obvious choice. Who needs to compare versions when you can just run the dang thing and see what's up? Debugging is where it's at, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
2 months ago
I'd go with D. Attaching to the live session and seeing the issue in action is the way to go. Hopefully, the session ID is easy to find!
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
1 months ago
Maybe we should try both B and D to cover all bases in our investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
1 months ago
I agree, but I still think D is the best option to see the issue happening in real time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
1 months ago
I think B is also important. Comparing previous versions can help identify where the bug was introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
That's a good point. Combining different methods could give a more comprehensive view of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
True, seeing it happen live can provide valuable insights. Maybe trying both options would be the most thorough approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
2 months ago
I agree, it's always helpful to have a reference point. But I still think D is the best way to see the bug in action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
I think B is a good option too. Comparing previous versions could help pinpoint the changes that caused the bug.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
2 months ago
I would also consider option C, debugging the flow with known inputs can provide valuable insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 months ago
I agree with Stephaine, comparing previous versions and using the Org Browser tool can help identify the bug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe a combination of B and C would be the most thorough approach? Gotta love those flow bugs, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Cassie
1 months ago
Definitely, that way we can cover all our bases and hopefully find the bug causing the flow errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
2 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Then we can also open the Flow, select Debug, provide the inputs, and run it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 months ago
I think we should look at the previous flow versions and compare them with the current one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
3 months ago
I think B and D would be the best choices here. Comparing the old and new versions could really help pinpoint the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. I can't wait to see the debug results and figure out what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
2 months ago
Sounds like a plan, let's get to the bottom of this bug!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
Let's start with option C and then move on to option B if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
2 months ago
I think we should also consider option B to compare previous flow versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
2 months ago
I agree, option C sounds like the best way to troubleshoot the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
I think option A and B are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77