New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2B Solution Architect Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B Solution Architect exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All B2B Solution Architect Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) has expanded rapidly in recent yean following a number of acquisitions. The new CMO wants to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs to luck-start a new targeted campaign in uC's mam Salesforce org. The acquired company would like to keep its Lead data because it enriches the Lead before it comes into Salesforce via third-party marketing tool and supports its direct sales channel. Beyond the Lead use case, both Salesforce orgs will remain completely independent from one another.

Which integration approach should a Solution Architect recommend between the UC mam org (the target org) and the acquired org (the source org)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Option D would involve discussing a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrating Leads to the target org after they are enriched in the source org. This would allow both Salesforce orgs to remain independent from each other, while also enabling UC to use all Leads from one of the acquired Salesforce orgs for its new targeted campaign. This would also preserve the value of Lead enrichment that happens in the source org via third-party marketing tool.

https://trailhead.salesforce.com/credentials/b2bsolutionarchitect


Contribute your Thoughts:

Edda
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure the acquired company is even going to go along with any of these options? They might just want to take their ball and go home. Gotta tread carefully here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
6 months ago
Option A is just plain lazy. Manual data migrations? Who has time for that these days? No, gotta go with one of the more automated options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
6 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Deprecating the source org's lead collection capabilities? That's a recipe for disaster. Better to play nice and integrate the systems, not force a takeover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Keeping the lead enrichment process in the source org and then migrating the leads makes the most sense to me. Why disrupt a working system when you don't have to?
upvoted 0 times
Julie
6 months ago
Yeah, disrupting a working system can cause more harm than good. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
6 months ago
I think it's important to maintain the lead enrichment process in the source org before migrating them to the target org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
6 months ago
I agree, it's important to keep the lead enrichment process intact. Option D seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
6 months ago
Option D sounds like a good plan. It allows the source org to enrich the Leads before migrating them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
6 months ago
I agree with you. Option D seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
7 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach here. Migrating the leads after they're enriched in the source org maintains the value-add from the third-party tool, while still getting the leads into the target org. Seems like a balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
6 months ago
Option B seems like the best approach here. Migrating the leads after they're enriched in the source org maintains the value-add from the third-party tool, while still getting the leads into the target org. Seems like a balanced solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
7 months ago
B) Discuss a strategy between the source org and target org Sales teams on the criteria of Leads to migrate from the source org to the target org, and migrate Leads to the target org before the enrichment within the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77