Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Architect Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Architect exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 2
[All B2C Commerce Architect Questions]

The Client identifies that a segment of customers need to see some products on the site that other customers should not be able to access. All products are maintained within one catalog but in separate categories. A custom attribute will be used on the Profile system object to identify customers that belong to this special segment. A customer group will be made that is qualified for by this Profile custom attribute. The storefront will be customized to include navigation to relevant categories for this customer group.

Unfortunately during technical review the Client points out that the business teams have raised a concern with maintenance and want to use a shared navigation within the catalog and not use separate categories.

Which item should the Architect suggest to efficiently fulfil this new requirement while maintaining scalability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The optimal solution for this requirement is to modify the search results dynamically based on the user's customer group membership. This approach:

Ensures that all users can navigate the same catalog and categories without seeing separate categories for special segments.

Dynamically includes or excludes products from search results based on the user's membership in the special segment, effectively using existing catalog structures while personalizing product visibility.

Maintains scalability by leveraging existing catalog and category infrastructure without needing additional custom attributes for navigation purposes.

This method aligns with best practices for creating personalized customer experiences in B2C Commerce without complicating catalog management.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Delsie
2 months ago
But option C also seems like a viable solution by modifying the search result to include the products appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
Option A is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure how well a hidden search refinement would work in practice. Might be a bit of a hacky solution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Devorah
1 months ago
Yeah, Option B sounds like a more efficient way to fulfill the requirement while maintaining scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 months ago
I think Option B might be a better approach, using separate storefront catalogs with the same navigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Option A could work, but I agree that it might be a bit of a hacky solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient as it separates the storefront catalogs for better organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for customization based on the customer group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
2 months ago
Haha, Option D is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Why use a product cusErinn attribute when you've already got a perfectly good cusErinner group setup? That's just adding unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
2 months ago
C) Customize the Storefront to modify the search result that if the user is in the customer group then the result includes those products appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
B) Customize the Storefront to use separate storefront catalogs with the same navigation that if the customer is in the customer group gets assigned products appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
2 months ago
A) Customize the Storefront to use a hidden search refinement that if the user is in the customer group then the result includes those products with a new custom attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Modifying the search results directly based on the cusErinner group seems like a clean and efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
3 months ago
Option B seems the most logical choice, as it allows for a shared navigation while still catering to the special customer segment. Separate catalogs with the same navigation structure should keep things scalable and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
Laticia
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to maintain scalability while meeting the new requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
1 months ago
B) Customize the Storefront to use separate storefront catalogs with the same navigation that If the customer Is In the customer group gets assign products appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 months ago
That sounds like a good solution. It keeps things organized for the special customer segment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
B) Customize the Storefront to use separate storefront catalogs with the same navigation that If the customer Is In the customer group gets assign products appropriately.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77