Salesforce Exam B2C-Commerce-Architect Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C-Commerce-Architect exam

Question #: 42
Topic #: 3

A developer is validating the pipeline cache and noticed that the PDP page is very low cached. The one parameter is snowing the position on the product fisting page upon checking the site and code.

What should the developer adjust in order to improve the page cache hit ratio, keeping in mind that the client is Insisting on the parameter for their analytics?

ARework the implementation so it reads the parameter on client-side, passesit to the analytics and exclude It from cache parameters.

BAdd the key to the cache exclude parameters.

CRework the Implementation so it doesn't depend on that parameter.

DRework the Implementation so the parameter is not passed In the URL and isread from the URL hash.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Mitsue at Jun 22, 2024, 12:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C-Commerce-Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carlton

2 months ago

I agree with Ashlyn. Option D seems like a good compromise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

2 months ago

That's a good point. Maybe we should consider option D instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

2 months ago

But what if excluding the parameter affects the analytics?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

2 months ago

I think we should go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hold up, did the question say the parameter is 'snowing' the position on the product listing page? I didn't know weather conditions could impact product listings. Anyway, Option C looks like the best choice to me.

upvoted 0 times

Mike

19 days ago

Alaine: Let's go ahead and rework the implementation to improve the page cache hit ratio.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

22 days ago

User 3: I think we should go with Option C as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

23 days ago

User 2: Yeah, reworking the implementation so it doesn't depend on that parameter sounds like a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, Option C seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lea

2 months ago

I'm not sure I agree with Option A. Passing the parameter to the analytics and excluding it from the cache parameters could introduce additional overhead and complexity. Option B might be a simpler solution.

upvoted 0 times

Dorothy

2 months ago

True, adding the key to the cache exclude parameters could be more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

2 months ago

Option B might be a simpler solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Makeda

3 months ago

Option A seems like a good solution. Reading the parameter on the client-side and excluding it from the cache parameters should help improve the cache hit ratio while still providing the necessary analytics data.

upvoted 0 times

Rosalind

2 months ago

That sounds like a good compromise. It should satisfy the client's need for analytics while also improving the cache hit ratio.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

2 months ago

A) Rework the implementation so it reads the parameter on client-side, passes it to the analytics and exclude it from cache parameters.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salesforce Exam B2C-Commerce-Architect Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlton

Ashlyn

Billy

Ashlyn

Vi

Mike

Myra

Alaine

Fannie

Lea

Dorothy

Felix

Makeda

Rosalind

Lenna