Salesforce Exam B2C-Commerce-Architect Topic 4 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C-Commerce-Architect exam

Question #: 44
Topic #: 4

A developer is validating the pipeline cache and noticed that the PDP page is very low cached. The one parameter is snowing the position on the product fisting page upon checking the site and code.

What should the developer adjust in order to improve the page cache hit ratio, keeping in mind that the client is Insisting on the parameter for their analytics?

ARework the implementation so it reads the parameter on client-side, passesit to the analytics and exclude It from cache parameters.

BAdd the key to the cache exclude parameters.

CRework the Implementation so it doesn't depend on that parameter.

DRework the Implementation so the parameter is not passed In the URL and isread from the URL hash.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Valentin at Jul 06, 2024, 06:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C-Commerce-Architect Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Pearlie

1 months ago

Ah, the old cache problem. Gotta love those pesky parameters, am I right? Option A is definitely the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

1 months ago

Option D looks interesting, but it might be a bit of a stretch to change the URL structure just for this one parameter. Option A is probably the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

Leota

3 days ago

Let's go with Option A to keep the client happy and improve the cache hit ratio.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eliseo

8 days ago

Yeah, changing the URL structure for just one parameter seems like overkill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

18 days ago

I agree, Option A seems like the most practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

1 months ago

That could work! It would improve the page cache hit ratio while still satisfying the client's analytics requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure Option C is a good idea since the client insists on the parameter. Might as well just go with Option A and avoid any potential issues.

upvoted 0 times