Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Architect Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Architect exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 4
[All B2C Commerce Architect Questions]

A client receives multiple feeds from third parties on the same SFTP location:

* Product prices (sftp: prod/prices)

* Stores information (sftp: prod/stores;

* Product information (sftp: prod/catalog)

* Categories information (sftp: prod/marketing)

* Content (sftp: prod/marketing)

Some of the feeds are placed on sftp multiple times a day, as the information is updated in the source system.

The Architect decides to have only two jobs:

* One that checks and downloads available feeds every hour

* One that imports the files from Webdav once a day before the data replication, using the standards steps available in the Job Framework

Which design is correctfor the import Job, taking the steps scope in consideration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This design maximizes efficiency and concurrency. By having the jobs that import products, stores, prices, and content run in parallel, the system can handle multiple data streams simultaneously, reducing total processing time. The sequential execution of importing categories followed by reindexing ensures that all new and updated information is properly indexed and available for site use, following the completion of the import of more frequently updated data. This order respects dependencies between steps and aligns with best practices for handling complex data workflows in B2C Commerce environments.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Melissa
4 days ago
Option B all the way! Keeping the category import and reindexing separate is the way to go. Anything else would just be asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
6 days ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is better because it separates the steps more clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
12 days ago
Hmm, Option C looks a bit messy with the content import happening last. I think Option B or D would be the cleanest solutions here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
14 days ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct design because it executes steps in parallel and then in sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
14 days ago
Option A sounds like a good idea, but executing the category import and reindexing in a separate flow seems like a better way to manage the process. I'd go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
16 days ago
I would go with Option D. Keeping the category import and reindexing as the last step ensures all the other data is loaded first, which is a sensible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
20 days ago
Option B seems the most logical. Separating the category import and reindexing steps makes sense to ensure the data is fully loaded before the final reindexing.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
3 days ago
I agree, it makes sense to separate the category import and reindexing steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
9 days ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Diane
25 days ago
I think the correct design for the import job is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77