Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Developer Topic 3 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Developer exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 3
[All B2C Commerce Developer Questions]

In the SFRA Page controller, the following route exists:

The result of navigating to the address below is an error page.

What is the correct way to use this controller route in an ISML template?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosio
2 months ago
Option D: Just throw the whole controller away and start from scratch. That'll show 'em who's boss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
I'm a bit puzzled by this question. It's like they're testing us on basic URL formatting. Option B is the way to go, no brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
3 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see your rationale. Option B might be the better choice after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
3 months ago
Option C? Really? That's just asking for trouble. You can't just hardcode the URL like that. It's gotta be Option B, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
1 months ago
Definitely, Option B is the safer choice here. It's important to avoid hardcoded URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option C seems risky, hardcoding URLs is not a good practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
2 months ago
I think Option B is the correct way to use the controller route in an ISML template.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azalee
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the correct way as it provides a more direct link to the controller route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
3 months ago
Option A looks tempting, but I'm pretty sure that's not the right way to do it. The controller expects specific parameters in the URL.
upvoted 0 times
Sabina
2 months ago
Yeah, Option B doesn't seem to be the right approach based on the controller's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 months ago
Option A might not work because the controller needs specific parameters in the URL to function correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
I agree, Option C seems to be the most appropriate choice for passing the required parameters to the controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 months ago
I think Option C is the correct way to use the controller route in the ISML template.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaclyn
3 months ago
I think Option B is the correct way to use this controller route. The ISML template needs to pass the required parameters in the URL to the controller.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
2 months ago
I think Option A might also work, but Option B seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
3 months ago
I agree, Option B is the correct way to use the controller route.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
3 months ago
I think the correct way is Option A because it seems to match the controller route.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77