Salesforce Exam CRT-211 Topic 3 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-211 exam

Question #: 102
Topic #: 3

The sales department has asked to limit access to the Amount field on the Opportunity to only tnose users. In the sales department and on the executtve team, Northern Trail Outfitters uses six custom profiles including Sales User. Marketing user, call Center user. Executive User Sales Manager user, ana call Center Manager user. Field level access is removed from three or the profiles In the sandbox.

What action should an administrator take to make sure this change is in production?

ACreate a sandbox template and push it to production to reflect the update.

BManually restrict access to this field for each profile via Setup Just like the sandbox.

CDeploy a change set from tht sandbox to prodUGBOffl including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

DProcess a change set with the profiles that should no longer have access to the field.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

A change set is a tool that allows you to send customizations from one Salesforce org to another. A change set can contain components such as objects, fields, profiles, permission sets, workflows, and more. You can use change sets to migrate changes from a sandbox org to a production org or between two sandbox orgs that are affiliated with the same production org. In this case, you can deploy a change set from the sandbox to production that includes the Amount field and all the custom profiles that need access to it. This way, you can update the field-level security settings for the field on each profile in one deployment. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.changesets.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.changesets_components_field.htm&type=5

by Dana at Sep 16, 2024, 04:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Stefany

2 months ago

I'm going with C. Deploying the change set from the sandbox is the way to go. Hey, at least it's not a multiple-choice question about the Dewey Decimal System!

upvoted 0 times

Jerry

1 months ago

Definitely. Deploying the change set is the most efficient way to ensure the update is implemented correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

1 months ago

That's a good choice. It's important to make sure the change is reflected in production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

2 months ago

C) Deploy a change set from the sandbox to production including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

2 months ago

B? More like 'Boo' to manually restricting access for each profile. C is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

Vicky

1 months ago

B? More like 'Boo' to manually restricting access for each profile. C is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivienne

1 months ago

C) Deploy a change set from the sandbox to production including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvia

1 months ago

A) Create a sandbox template and push it to production to reflect the update.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

2 months ago

D sounds good, but I think C is better. It's more comprehensive and covers all the profiles.

upvoted 0 times

Ailene

1 months ago

That sounds like the best approach to ensure the update is implemented correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

Let's deploy a change set from the sandbox to production, including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

2 months ago

I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to make sure the change is in production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kent

2 months ago

I think we should go with option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

2 months ago

C is definitely the best option. It ensures all profiles are covered in the change set.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devon

2 months ago

D) Process a change set with the profiles that should no longer have access to the field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

2 months ago

C) Deploy a change set from the sandbox to production including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

3 months ago

I'm not sure, maybe we should manually restrict access to the field for each profile like in the sandbox.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

3 months ago

I agree with Belen, that seems like the most efficient way to make sure the change is in production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

3 months ago

I think we should deploy a change set from the sandbox to production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

3 months ago

C is the way to go. Pushing the sandbox changes to production is the most efficient solution here.

upvoted 0 times

Emilio

2 months ago

D) Process a change set with the profiles that should no longer have access to the field.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

2 months ago

C is the way to go. Pushing the sandbox changes to production is the most efficient solution here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

2 months ago

A) Create a sandbox template and push it to production to reflect the update.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

2 months ago

C) Deploy a change set from the sandbox to production including the Amount field with all the custom profiles.

upvoted 0 times

...