Salesforce Exam CRT-211 Topic 5 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-211 exam

Question #: 92
Topic #: 5

Northen trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to change the current master-detail relationship between Shipments and Opportunity to a lookup relationship. The system administrator has made the necessary changes in a full sandbox and has successfully tested them against NTO's data.

Now that the changes are ready to implement in production, what should the system administrator do next?

AMake the changes directly in the production org.

BCreate an Unmanaged Package to distribute to production.

CUse Data Loader to export the changes to the production org.

DAdd the components to an outbound change set and deploy it to production.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

To make sure that the changes are in production, you need to add the components to an outbound change set and deploy it to production. A change set is a tool that allows you to send customizations from one Salesforce org to another. A change set can contain components such as objects, fields, profiles, permission sets, workflows, and more. You can use change sets to migrate changes from a sandbox org to a production org or between two sandbox orgs that are affiliated with the same production org. In this case, you need to add the master-detail field and all the affected profiles to an outbound change set in your sandbox org and then deploy it to your production org. Reference: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.changesets.htm&type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.changesets_components_field.htm&type=5

by Jennie at Jun 19, 2024, 10:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Levi

2 months ago

Creating an Unmanaged Package could work too, but I still think using an outbound change set is the most reliable method for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

2 months ago

I'm not sure about using an outbound change set. Maybe we should consider creating an Unmanaged Package (Option B) instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamae

2 months ago

Data Loader, eh? Sounds like a lot of manual work. I'd rather let the system handle it for me, you know? Change set is the way to go, in my humble opinion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

2 months ago

Haha, making changes directly in production? That's like playing Russian roulette with your org! Definitely not the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit skeptical about using an unmanaged package. Wouldn't that make it harder to track and manage the changes in the long run? I'd go with the change set idea.

upvoted 0 times

Tiffiny

1 months ago

Yeah, unmanaged packages can get messy over time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

2 months ago

I agree, change sets are easier to track and manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carma

2 months ago

Whoa, I think option D is the way to go! Change sets are the safest way to deploy changes to production, right? Gotta make sure those changes don't break anything.

upvoted 0 times

Stevie

2 months ago

User 2: Definitely, it helps ensure that everything is properly deployed without causing any issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royal

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, using change sets is a safe way to deploy changes to production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

2 months ago

I agree with Levi. Using an outbound change set is the best option to deploy the changes to production without any issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

3 months ago

I think we should add the components to an outbound change set and deploy it to production (Option D). It's the safest way to ensure everything gets transferred correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...