New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-211 Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-211 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All CRT-211 Questions]

The administrator at Cloud Kicks recently replaced several case workflow rules with a single before save flow. Since this change, some cases are routing In unexpected ways.

What could be the cause or the charges to routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dino
6 months ago
I think the issue could be due to multiple automation tools being used, which might be executing the automation in a different order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
I'm going to go with B. Workflow rules should come before assignment rules, so if they flipped that, no wonder the cases are going haywire!
upvoted 0 times
Pearline
6 months ago
I agree, it's important to have the right order of automation processes in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
6 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely be causing the routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
6 months ago
I think B makes sense. Workflow rules should come before assignment rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rene
6 months ago
It's possible that the assignment rules are no longer referencing the correct fields, leading to the routing problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
7 months ago
I believe the flow might be executing before the assignment rules, causing the unexpected routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
7 months ago
Hah, looks like the admins at Cloud Kicks are having a real case of the Mondays! I'd go with C - the assignment rules are probably referencing the wrong fields.
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D - multiple automation tools causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
6 months ago
I think it could be A - the old workflow rules might still be active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
6 months ago
Yeah, it's likely that the assignment rules are no longer referencing the correct fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
6 months ago
I think you're right, C does seem like a possible cause for the routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
7 months ago
I think the answer is B. The flow precedes assignment rules, so the workflow rules are executed after the assignment rules, which could cause the unexpected routing.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
6 months ago
It's also possible that the assignment rules no longer reference the correct fields, leading to unexpected routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
6 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
6 months ago
Another possibility is that multiple automation tools are being used and the order of execution is causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
6 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
6 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
6 months ago
It could also be that the old workflow rules are still active and interfering with the new flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
6 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
7 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
7 months ago
That makes sense. The flow running before assignment rules could definitely impact routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
7 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alpha
7 months ago
D seems like the most likely option to me. Using multiple automation tools can definitely lead to execution order issues and impact routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
7 months ago
I agree with Alisha. That could definitely be causing the routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
7 months ago
I think the old workflow rules might still be active.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77