Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-211 Topic 8 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-211 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 8
[All CRT-211 Questions]

The administrator at Cloud Kicks recently replaced several case workflow rules with a single before save flow. Since this change, some cases are routing In unexpected ways.

What could be the cause or the charges to routing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Olga
3 months ago
I'm putting my money on A. The old workflow rules have a way of haunting you, even after you think you've replaced them.
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, those old workflow rules can be sneaky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 months ago
User 1: I think A is the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Gotta love IT troubleshooting, it's like a never-ending puzzle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
3 months ago
C seems like the most likely culprit. The assignment rules need to reference the right fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
3 months ago
I'm going with D. It's probably a mix of different automation tools causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
2 months ago
D) Multiple automation tools have been used and the automation is executed in a different order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
B) The flow precedes assignment rules; workflow rules are after assignment rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
2 months ago
User3: Maybe it's a combination of both A and D causing the routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
User2: I'm leaning towards D, multiple automation tools could be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
2 months ago
User1: I think it could be A, the old workflow rules might still be active.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
3 months ago
A) The old workflow rules are still active and impacting routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chau
3 months ago
I think it's option B. The flow should come after the assignment rules, not before them.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
2 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. If the flow is happening before the assignment rules, it could definitely be causing issues with routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
2 months ago
User 1: I think it's option B. The flow should come after the assignment rules, not before them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Maybe the old workflow rules are still active, like option A suggests. That could be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
3 months ago
User 2: That makes sense. The order of automation execution is important in determining routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
3 months ago
I think it could also be option D. Multiple automation tools might be causing the unexpected routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
3 months ago
User 1: I think it's option B. The flow should come after the assignment rules, not before them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
3 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. The flow should definitely come after the assignment rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Donte
3 months ago
I believe it could also be that multiple automation tools are being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
I agree with Olive. The old rules might be conflicting with the new flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
3 months ago
I think the cause could be that the old workflow rules are still active.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77