Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-250 Topic 3 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-250 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 3
[All CRT-250 Questions]

A Marketing Cloud admin at a bank is asked to avoid storing sensitive data in the

cloud. This data will only be sent to Marketing cloud to execute a send.

Which feature would the admin use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacqueline
6 months ago
Forget the exam, I'm just here for the jokes. Did you hear about the database administrator who lost their password? They had a structured query language!
upvoted 0 times
Martha
5 months ago
C) Field Level Encryption
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
5 months ago
A) Tokenized Sending
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
6 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? If I can't store the data in the cloud, why would I use List Sending? That just seems like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
6 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of storing sensitive data in the cloud. I'm going with C) Field Level Encryption. Can't go wrong with good old-fashioned encryption, right?
upvoted 0 times
Johana
5 months ago
D) Distributed Marketing Sends might be another way to meet the requirement without storing sensitive data in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
D) Distributed Marketing Sends might be a good choice to ensure the data is not stored in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
5 months ago
I think A) Tokenized Sending could also be a good option to avoid storing sensitive data in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
I think A) Tokenized Sending could also be a good option to avoid storing sensitive data in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
5 months ago
I agree, C) Field Level Encryption is the way to go for keeping sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
I agree, C) Field Level Encryption is the way to go for keeping sensitive data safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
6 months ago
D) Distributed Marketing Sends? That's a new one to me. I wonder if it's some kind of secret Marketing Cloud feature I haven't heard of before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
6 months ago
Tokenized Sending sounds interesting, but I'm not sure it's the right fit for this scenario. Hmm, I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
6 months ago
I agree with Thora. Field Level Encryption would ensure that sensitive data is protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
6 months ago
I think the answer is C) Field Level Encryption. That's the best way to protect sensitive data without storing it in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
5 months ago
I agree, Field Level Encryption is the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
5 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to protect sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
5 months ago
I think the answer is C) Field Level Encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
6 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to protect sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
6 months ago
I think the answer is C) Field Level Encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
6 months ago
Yes, that's the right choice to meet the requirement of not storing sensitive data in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
6 months ago
Yes, that feature will allow us to send the data without storing it in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
6 months ago
I agree, C) Field Level Encryption is the best option for protecting sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
I agree, C) Field Level Encryption is the best option to protect sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
6 months ago
I think the admin should use Field Level Encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77