Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-250 Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-250 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All CRT-250 Questions]

A Marketing Cloud admin at a bank is asked to avoid storing sensitive data in the

cloud. This data will only be sent to Marketing cloud to execute a send.

Which feature would the admin use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lasandra
2 months ago
Come on, everyone knows Tokenized Sending is the answer. It's like putting your secrets in a vault - the cloud can't touch 'em!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
2 months ago
Haha, List Sending? What is this, the 90s? Field Level Encryption is the way to go, my dudes.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 months ago
Distributed Marketing Sends might be useful for sending data to multiple locations securely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 months ago
Tokenized Sending could also be a good choice for added security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 months ago
I agree, Field Level Encryption is the best option to protect sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 months ago
Yeah, List Sending is outdated. Field Level Encryption is much more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
2 months ago
Distributed Marketing Sends, huh? Sounds like a real party in the cloud, but I'm not trying to get my bank's business all up in there.
upvoted 0 times
Marg
2 months ago
C: Definitely, it's important to prioritize security when dealing with sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
2 months ago
B: Yeah, that sounds like the best option to meet the requirement without storing the data in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
A: I think the admin would use Field Level Encryption to keep the sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brock
3 months ago
I think both options are valid, but ultimately it depends on the specific needs and security measures of the bank.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I see your point, Olive. Tokenized Sending could also work, but I still think Field Level Encryption is more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
3 months ago
But wouldn't Tokenized Sending also be a good choice for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
3 months ago
Tokenized Sending sounds like the way to go. Keeps the juicy stuff out of the cloud, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
3 months ago
I agree with Lauran, Field Level Encryption would be the best option to avoid storing sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I think the admin should use Field Level Encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
3 months ago
I'd go with Field Level Encryption. Gotta keep that sensitive data secure, yo!
upvoted 0 times
Dean
2 months ago
Definitely, we need to make sure that sensitive data is protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 months ago
B: Yeah, definitely don't want any data breaches happening. Field Level Encryption is the best option for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
2 months ago
I agree, Field Level Encryption is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
3 months ago
A: I agree, Field Level Encryption is the way to go for keeping sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77