Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-251 Topic 24 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-251 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 24
[All CRT-251 Questions]

Sales leadership at Universal Containers is concerned that sales reps are negotiating deals with contacts without the authority to make a decision, resulting is lost deals.

What should the consultant recommend to resolve the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To avoid lost deals due to negotiating with non-decision makers, requiring sales reps to identify and designate a contact as the decision maker on each opportunity ensures that the appropriate stakeholders are involved. This approach enforces the validation of the decision maker role, which can help prevent deals from stalling or being lost due to lack of authority on the contact's part. Salesforce allows configuration of required fields or processes to make sure critical information is captured before advancing stages, helping align the sales process with effective decision-making structures.

Refer to Salesforce's Opportunity Contact Roles documentation for further insights on managing contacts in opportunities.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorean
1 days ago
I see both points, but I think option A could also work. Allowing sales reps to mark the contact as 'Primary' can help indicate the decision maker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 days ago
Option C looks interesting, but it might add an extra layer of complexity. I'd go with Option B for its simplicity and effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
6 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more effective. With Opportunity Teams, sales reps can easily track the decision maker for each opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
7 days ago
I agree with Option B. Requiring the rep to add the decision maker will help us track the right contact and avoid lost deals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
8 days ago
I think option B is the best solution. It ensures that the decision maker is clearly identified before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
9 days ago
Option B seems the most logical choice. We need to ensure that the decision maker is clearly identified before progressing the deal.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
4 days ago
It's important for sales reps to have clarity on who the decision maker is before moving forward with a deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
5 days ago
I agree, option B would help ensure the right stakeholders are involved in the decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77