Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-403 Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All CRT-403 Questions]

Universal Container's sales reps can modify fields on an opportunity until it is closed.

The sales operations team has access to modify the Post-Close Follow-up Date and Post-Close Follow-up Comments fields after the opportunity is closed. After the

opportunity is closed, the rest of the fields are read only.

How should these requirements be met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To manage field editability based on the opportunity status:

C . Use field-level security on page layouts with record types to restrict editing fields. This combination allows for different layouts and editable fields based on the status of the record (e.g., closed or open).

Steps to implement:

Create or adjust record types for open and closed opportunities.

For each record type, create a specific page layout.

On the page layout for closed opportunities, set the majority of fields to read-only using field-level security, except for the 'Post-Close Follow-up Date' and 'Post-Close Follow-up Comments' fields.

Assign the appropriate page layouts to the respective record types.

Update profiles or permission sets to use these record types and page layouts accordingly.

This setup ensures that sales reps can modify fields only when the opportunity is open, and the sales operations team can edit specific fields after closure.

For more information on using record types and page layouts, check Salesforce's documentation on Record Types.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cortney
23 days ago
Haha, reminds me of the time I had to untangle a web of field-level security and record types. Option C all the way, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Svetlana
3 days ago
Yeah, using field-level security on page layouts with record types is a good way to meet those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
9 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elke
1 months ago
Wait, wait, wait. Hold up. Isn't option C just the perfect combo of everything we need? Salesforce really knows how to make our lives easier, don't they?
upvoted 0 times
Mira
7 days ago
Yes, option C seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivienne
1 months ago
Alright, let's see... Oh, I know! Option C is the way to go. Can't go wrong with a little bit of everything, right?
upvoted 0 times
Samira
1 days ago
User 3: Agreed, it allows for restricting editing fields while still providing some flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
5 days ago
User 2: Yeah, using field-level security on page layouts with record types sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
6 days ago
User 1: I think Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
1 months ago
I agree with Sunshine. Using record types will help us meet the requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
2 months ago
I think we should use record types with field sets and restrict editing fields using field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Seems like the most comprehensive solution to me. Gotta love those Salesforce features, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
C'mon, this is a no-brainer! You need record types, field sets, and field-level security to get the job done. Gotta cover all your bases, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Tish
18 days ago
D) Use field-level security to mark fields as read-only on the Sales profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
20 days ago
C) Use field-level security on page layouts with record types to restrict editing fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
26 days ago
B) Use field-level security on page layouts to restrict editing fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 months ago
A) Use record types with field sets and restrict editing fields using field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77