Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam CRT-403 Topic 6 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 6
[All CRT-403 Questions]

An app builder installs an unmanaged package in a full copy sandbox that is an exact match for production, and now they are ready to install it m production. When the app builder attempts to install the package in production, it fails.

Why did the package fail to install?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Golda
3 months ago
This is why you always test in a full copy sandbox first. Clearly the object limits were exceeded, so option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Esteban
2 months ago
Looks like the object limits were exceeded, that's why it failed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 months ago
I thought everything was an exact match for production, why did it fail?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
3 months ago
Ha! I bet the app builder tried to install a package meant for a sandbox in a production org. Classic rookie mistake. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Donette
2 months ago
User 3: Option A it is then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that's a common mistake for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, definitely sounds like they used the wrong license types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
3 months ago
I heard that sometimes the installation fails due to Apex unit test failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
3 months ago
Could it be that object limits were exceeded causing the installation failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
3 months ago
I believe it's more likely that the package features are not compatible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
3 months ago
I think the package failed to install because of incorrect license types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
3 months ago
It seems like there are multiple factors that could have caused the package installation to fail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Package features not being compatible could also be a reason for the installation failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
4 months ago
I have experienced package installation failures due to Apex unit test failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
4 months ago
I believe it could also be due to object limits being exceeded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with option D. Apex unit test failures can definitely cause installation issues, so that's my best guess.
upvoted 0 times
Michael
3 months ago
Looks like we all think it's option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
3 months ago
I agree, Apex unit test failures can definitely cause installation issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
3 months ago
I'm going with option D, the Apex unit test failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
3 months ago
Maybe the object limits were exceeded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
3 months ago
User 2: No, I believe it's due to package features not being compatible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
3 months ago
User 1: I think it's because of incorrect license types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
I believe the package features are not compatible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
I think it's because of incorrect license types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ulysses
4 months ago
I think it's definitely option B. The package features must not be compatible with the production org, that's why it failed to install.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
4 months ago
I agree with Dallas, sometimes mismatched license types can cause installation issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
I think the package failed to install because of the incorrect license types.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77