Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Data Architect Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Data Architect exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All Data Architect Questions]

A national nonprofit organization is using Salesforce to recruit members. The recruitment process requires a member to be matched with a volunteer opportunity. Given the following:

1. A record is created in Project__ c and used to track the project through completion.

2. The member may then start volunteering and is required to track their volunteer hours, which is stored in VTOTime_c object related to the project.

3. Ability to view or edit the VTOTime__c object needs to be the same as the Project__ c

record.

4. Managers must see total hours volunteered while viewing the Project__ c record.

Which data relationship should the data architect use to support this requirement when creating the custom VTOTime__c object?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A master-detail field on VTOTime__c to Project__c is the data relationship that the data architect should use to support the requirement when creating the custom VTOTime__c object. A master-detail relationship creates a parent-child relationship between two objects, where the master record controls certain behaviors of the detail record, such as security, ownership, deletion, and roll-up summary fields. By using a master-detail field on VTOTime__c to Project__c, you can ensure that the ability to view or edit the VTOTime__c object is the same as the Project__c record, and that managers can see the total hours volunteered while viewing the Project__c record using a roll-up summary field.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Darell
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go, no doubt. It's the only one that satisfies all the requirements, including the need for managers to see the total hours. Anything less would just be a half-baked solution.
upvoted 0 times
Tequila
1 months ago
Option C is the clear winner here, it covers all the necessary bases for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
2 months ago
I think option C is the most efficient way to ensure all the requirements are met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 months ago
Yeah, option C seems to be the most comprehensive solution for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
2 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the nonprofit is really eager to see those volunteer hours roll up. Gotta keep those numbers looking good, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
3 months ago
I agree with Fernanda. The master-detail relationship is the way to go for this use case. It'll ensure the necessary access control and also allow the managers to see the total hours volunteered.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
2 months ago
Yes, I agree. The master-detail relationship will provide the needed functionality for tracking volunteer hours and viewing total hours volunteered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 months ago
C) Master Detail Field on VTOTime_ c to Project_c with rollup summary field on Project __c showing sum of hours from VTOTime_c records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fernanda
3 months ago
Option C seems the most logical choice here. The requirement clearly states that the ability to view or edit the VTOTime__c object needs to be the same as the Project__c record, which a master-detail relationship would provide.
upvoted 0 times
Daron
2 months ago
Yes, option C aligns well with the requirements provided for tracking volunteer hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 months ago
It makes sense to have a rollup summary field to show the total hours volunteered on the Project__c record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
2 months ago
I agree, a master-detail relationship would ensure the required visibility and editing capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlean
3 months ago
I agree with Geraldine, C seems to be the best choice because it allows for the rollup summary field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77