Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Data-Architect Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Data Architect exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Data Architect Questions]

Universal Containers has implemented Salesforce for its operations. In order for customers to be created in their MDM solution, the customer record needs to have the following attributes:

1. First Name

2. Last Name

3. Email

Which option should the data architect recommend to mandate this when customers are created in Salesforce?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Creating validation rules to check if the required attributes are entered is the best option to mandate this when customers are created in Salesforce. Validation rules allow you to specify criteria that must be met before a record can be saved. You can use validation rules to ensure that customers have a first name, last name, and email when they are created in Salesforce. This way, you can prevent incomplete or invalid data from being sent to your MDM solution.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Huey
17 days ago
I prefer option C, it's simpler to mark fields as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
18 days ago
Wait, so we're not allowed to just leave the fields blank and hope the customer never notices? Dang, there goes my brilliant plan. Guess I'll have to go with option C, the boring-but-reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
6 days ago
User 1: Yeah, we can't leave the fields blank. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latrice
24 days ago
I agree with Lai, option A ensures data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 months ago
Option D sounds promising, but I'm not sure I'd trust an external system to handle my data validation. Better to keep it all within Salesforce, you know? Option C is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Jules
8 days ago
I see your point, but I still think Option C is the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
16 days ago
That's true, but creating validation rules could also work to ensure the required attributes are entered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
17 days ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just configure the Page Layout and mark the attributes as required fields?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
20 days ago
I agree with you, Option C seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardine
1 months ago
Option C is the equivalent of wearing socks with sandals - it gets the job done, but it's just not cool, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lenora
6 days ago
D) Build validation in Integration with MDM to check required attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
9 days ago
B) Create validation rules to check If the required attributes are entered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
10 days ago
A) Configure Page Layout marking attributes as required fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 months ago
Option C? More like Option 'See ya later, creativity!' Am I right, or am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
16 days ago
B) Create validation rules to check If the required attributes are entered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
20 days ago
A) Configure Page Layout marking attributes as required fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lai
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77