Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam DEX-450 Topic 12 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's DEX-450 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 12
[All DEX-450 Questions]

When the code executes, a DML exception is thrown.

How should a developer modify the code to ensure exceptions are handled gracefully?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ivan
3 months ago
I believe removing null items from the list of Accounts (option D) could prevent the DML exception as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 months ago
I think option A) Implement the upsert DML statement could also be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
3 months ago
I agree with Jerry, using try/catch block will help handle exceptions gracefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
Upsert? Really? That's overkill. Just give me a nice, clean try/catch and I'm good to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
3 months ago
Ha! Imagine trying to use Change Data Capture to fix a simple DML exception. That's like using a bazooka to swat a fly.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
2 months ago
Using Change Data Capture for a DML exception does seem like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
3 months ago
Yeah, that would be a more appropriate solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
3 months ago
Implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
4 months ago
I think we should implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
4 months ago
I think removing null items from the list of Accounts might also help prevent DML exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
4 months ago
I believe implementing Change Data Capture could also be a good option to handle exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I was thinking the same thing, Alease. C is definitely the way to go. Handling exceptions gracefully is so important in production code.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
3 months ago
I always make sure to use try/catch blocks in my code to handle exceptions properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
3 months ago
Definitely, try/catch blocks are essential for graceful exception handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
3 months ago
I agree, C is the best option for handling DML exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vince
4 months ago
I agree with Royal, using try/catch block will help handle exceptions gracefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
I think we should implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
C seems like the obvious choice here. Why wouldn't you just wrap the DML in a try/catch block to handle any exceptions?
upvoted 0 times
Milly
3 months ago
Definitely, using try/catch blocks can help prevent the code from crashing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
3 months ago
I agree, it's important to handle exceptions gracefully in code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
3 months ago
Rolande is right, wrapping the DML in a try/catch block is the best way to handle exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
C) Implement a try/catch block for the DML.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77