Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Industries CPQ Developer Topic 3 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Industries CPQ Developer exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 3
[All Industries CPQ Developer Questions]

A developer is creating rules to help launch a company's Smart Widget product. The company has launch only for opportunities for existing S2B customers.

Which context scope should the developer use in the context mapping for this rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dan
3 months ago
I think using context scope Opportunity, Account makes sense to ensure the rules are applied accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
3 months ago
I believe the developer should use context scope Opportunity, Account for a more targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
3 months ago
I agree with Glendora, because the company is focusing on existing S2B customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
3 months ago
I think the developer should use context scope Opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
3 months ago
I think using context scope Opportunity, Account makes sense to ensure the rule is applied accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
3 months ago
I believe the developer should use context scope Opportunity, Account for a more targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
3 months ago
I agree with King, because the launch is only for existing S2B customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
I think the developer should use context scope Opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
4 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of context scopes. I say we just flip a coin and hope for the best. Or maybe we can bribe the developer to give us the answer. Just kidding, of course!
upvoted 0 times
Cora
2 months ago
C) Opportunity, Account
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
3 months ago
B) Order, Account
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
A) Opportunity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilene
4 months ago
I don't know, this question is a bit tricky. Maybe B would work too, since the Order is part of the opportunity, right?
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
2 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most specific option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
D) Account
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
3 months ago
I think C makes more sense because it includes both Opportunity and Account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
3 months ago
C) Opportunity, Account
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
3 months ago
A) Opportunity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D. The rules are only for existing S2B customers, so the context scope should just be the Account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
4 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The rules are for the company's Smart Widget product, so the context scope should include both the Opportunity and the Account to capture the full context.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
3 months ago
I think C is the most comprehensive choice for the context mapping in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
3 months ago
Yeah, including both Opportunity and Account in the context scope makes sense for this rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
3 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
4 months ago
Including both Opportunity and Account in the context scope will provide a comprehensive view for the Smart Widget product launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
4 months ago
Opportunity and Account are definitely key components to consider for this rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
4 months ago
I think it's important to include both Opportunity and Account to ensure the rules are applied correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best choice to cover all the necessary context.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77