Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Industries-CPQ-Developer Topic 3 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Industries CPQ Developer exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Industries CPQ Developer Questions]

A developer is creating rules to help launch a company's Smart Widget product. The company has launch only for opportunities for existing S2B customers.

Which context scope should the developer use in the context mapping for this rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glendora
1 days ago
I think the developer should use context scope Opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
4 days ago
I think using context scope Opportunity, Account makes sense to ensure the rule is applied accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
5 days ago
I believe the developer should use context scope Opportunity, Account for a more targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
7 days ago
I agree with King, because the launch is only for existing S2B customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
10 days ago
I think the developer should use context scope Opportunity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
13 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of context scopes. I say we just flip a coin and hope for the best. Or maybe we can bribe the developer to give us the answer. Just kidding, of course!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
18 days ago
I don't know, this question is a bit tricky. Maybe B would work too, since the Order is part of the opportunity, right?
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
1 days ago
A) Opportunity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D. The rules are only for existing S2B customers, so the context scope should just be the Account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The rules are for the company's Smart Widget product, so the context scope should include both the Opportunity and the Account to capture the full context.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
6 days ago
I think C is the most comprehensive choice for the context mapping in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
9 days ago
Yeah, including both Opportunity and Account in the context scope makes sense for this rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
12 days ago
I agree, C seems like the best option to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
15 days ago
Including both Opportunity and Account in the context scope will provide a comprehensive view for the Smart Widget product launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
28 days ago
Opportunity and Account are definitely key components to consider for this rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
29 days ago
I think it's important to include both Opportunity and Account to ensure the rules are applied correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
1 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best choice to cover all the necessary context.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77