Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Industries-CPQ-Developer Topic 6 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Industries CPQ Developer exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 6
[All Salesforce Certified Industries CPQ Developer Questions]

A developer is creating rules to help launch a company's Smart Widget product. The company has launch only for opportunities for existing S2B customers.

Which context scope should the developer use in the context mapping for this rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elfriede
3 months ago
I'm going with C) Opportunity, Account. It covers all the bases and makes the most sense for this specific use case. Plus, I like that it's a nice, balanced answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
3 months ago
Haha, this is a tricky one! I'm tempted to say D) Account, just to be different. But I agree with Lauran, C) is probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Jestine
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It covers both aspects needed for the Smart Widget product launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
3 months ago
I think C) Opportunity, Account makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rachael
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B) Order, Account seems like it could work too, since the company is launching for existing S2B customers. But I think C) is the safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
3 months ago
I agree, it covers both the opportunity and account aspects for existing S2B customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
3 months ago
I think C) Opportunity, Account is the best choice for the context scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
4 months ago
I'd go with C) Opportunity, Account. The question clearly states the rule is for launching the Smart Widget product, so the context should include the Opportunity and the Account that the customer is associated with.
upvoted 0 times
Cassie
3 months ago
C) Opportunity, Account seems to be the most appropriate choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
3 months ago
Including both Opportunity and Account ensures the rule is specific to existing S2B customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
3 months ago
It's important to consider both the Opportunity and the Account for this rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
3 months ago
I would also choose C) Opportunity, Account for the context scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
3 months ago
Agreed, including both Opportunity and Account makes sense for launching the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
4 months ago
I think C) Opportunity, Account is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77