Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Industries CPQ Developer Topic 8 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Industries CPQ Developer exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 8
[All Industries CPQ Developer Questions]

A developer is creating rules to help launch a company's Smart Widget product. The company has launch only for opportunities for existing S2B customers.

Which context scope should the developer use in the context mapping for this rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Linn
6 months ago
D) Account, because who doesn't love a good old-fashioned Account context? It's the foundation of any successful product launch, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
6 months ago
I'm torn between C) Opportunity, Account and D) Account. Maybe I'll just go with D) and hope for the best. Gotta love these context scope questions!
upvoted 0 times
Shay
5 months ago
Yeah, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to context mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
5 months ago
I agree, it's always better to cover more bases when creating rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
I think C) Opportunity, Account would be the best choice for the context scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dolores
6 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with B) Order, Account. The company is launching a product, so I think the Order context is important too.
upvoted 0 times
Jose
5 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think A) Opportunity would be enough since we are targeting existing customers specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
I agree with you, C) Opportunity, Account makes sense. It covers both the customer's opportunities and their account information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
I think C) Opportunity, Account would be the best choice. We need to focus on existing customers and their opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D) Account. The question says the launch is only for existing S2B customers, so the Account context is the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
6 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C) Opportunity, Account. The question specifically mentions the context is for the Smart Widget product, so we need to consider both the Opportunity and the Account context.
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
5 months ago
Yes, it makes sense to include both Opportunity and Account in the context mapping to ensure the rules are specific to the target customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
5 months ago
I agree, the Smart Widget product is targeted towards existing S2B customers, so both Opportunity and Account contexts are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. It's important to have the right context scope in the context mapping for the rule to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
6 months ago
I agree, the Smart Widget product is for existing S2B customers, so we need to consider both Opportunity and Account context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
6 months ago
Yes, the context mapping should include both Opportunity and Account to ensure the rules are specific to existing S2B customers for the Smart Widget product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
6 months ago
I think it's a combination of Opportunity and Account, as we need to consider the customer's existing opportunities and account information for the Smart Widget launch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
6 months ago
I agree, the Smart Widget product is targeted towards existing S2B customers, so both Opportunity and Account contexts are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77