Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Javascript-Developer-I Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer I exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer I Questions]

A developer has an ErrorHandler module that contains multiple functions.

What kind of export should be leveraged so that multiple functions can be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Doug
3 months ago
Larue makes a good point, but in this case we have multiple functions, so named export seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
3 months ago
I believe default export is also an option, as it can export a single function as the default.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
3 months ago
I agree with Arlen, named export allows us to export multiple functions with specific names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the developer who wrote this question loves puns. 'Multi' export? Really? B) named is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
3 months ago
B) named is the way to go. I can't imagine trying to remember which function is which with a default export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
3 months ago
Definitely B) named. Who would want to import everything with an 'all' export? That's just messy.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
2 months ago
I prefer named exports as well, it just makes it easier to manage and understand the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
I think default export could work too, but named exports are definitely cleaner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 months ago
I agree, using named exports keeps things organized and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
3 months ago
Yeah, default exports can get confusing when you have multiple functions in a module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
3 months ago
I agree, using named exports keeps things organized and clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlen
3 months ago
I think for multiple functions, named export should be used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
4 months ago
I think default export is the best choice here, because it simplifies the import process for all the functions in the module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
4 months ago
I believe the answer is B) named, it makes the most sense to export each function separately for better organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) all, because we want to export all the functions in the ErrorHandler module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) named. It's the best way to export multiple functions so they can be imported and used individually.
upvoted 0 times
Winifred
2 months ago
Yes, named exports are the best choice for exporting multiple functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
2 months ago
Got it, named exports are the way to go for multiple functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
3 months ago
Exactly, default exports can only export one value while named exports can export multiple values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
3 months ago
So, named exports are more flexible than default exports?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
3 months ago
That's right, with named exports you can import only what you need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
3 months ago
Yes, named exports allow you to import specific functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) named.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cammy
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think default export could also work if we want to export everything at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
4 months ago
I agree, named export is the way to go if we want to use multiple functions separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) named, because we need to export multiple functions individually.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77