Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Topic 3 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

When a Mule application using VM queues is deployed to a customer-hosted cluster or multiple CloudHub v1.0 workers/replicas, how are messages consumed across the nodes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shonda
3 months ago
Haha, the question mentions 'Mule' and 'VM queues' - sounds like a wild ride! I'll go with C, keep it interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
3 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Maybe the question is a trick and the answer is something completely unexpected!
upvoted 0 times
Helene
2 months ago
Maybe it's D, messages are consumed round-robin within an XA transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe it's D, messages are consumed round-robin within an XA transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
2 months ago
I believe it's B, messages are consumed sequentially only from the primary node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
2 months ago
I think it's C, messages are consumed in a non-deterministic way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
I believe it's B, messages are consumed sequentially only from the primary node.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
I think it's C, messages are consumed in a non-deterministic way.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katy
4 months ago
I'm going with D. Round-robin distribution across nodes sounds like the most efficient way to handle this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Why would messages be consumed sequentially in a distributed system? That doesn't make much sense.
upvoted 0 times
Kathrine
2 months ago
Exactly, different scenarios may require different message consumption strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
2 months ago
I guess it depends on the specific requirements of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
3 months ago
That's true, but message order is important in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
I agree, round-robin makes sense for distributing messages across nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
3 months ago
I see your point, but round-robin can help with load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
3 months ago
I think the answer is D. Round-robin seems like the most efficient way to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
3 months ago
But wouldn't that cause issues with message order? I still believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
4 months ago
I think the answer is D. Round-robin is a common way to distribute messages in a cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77