Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Topic 5 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I Questions]

What is the MuleSoft-recommended best practice to share the connector and configuration information among the APIs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Chanel at May 30, 2024, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lonny
2 months ago
Haha, I wonder if the exam question is trying to trip us up with all these options. Looks like I'll have to really think through the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
Using an API proxy with a shared configuration sounds like a great way to manage the connector details. This would give me a lot of flexibility in terms of updating the configuration without impacting the APIs.
upvoted 0 times
Rashad
2 months ago
D) Create an API proxy for each System API and share the Database connector configuration with all the API proxies via an automated policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
2 months ago
A) Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
3 months ago
Creating a central System API to access the database is an interesting approach, but it adds an extra layer of complexity. I'm not sure if this is the best solution for my use case.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
2 months ago
Creating a central System API to access the database is an interesting approach, but it adds an extra layer of complexity. I'm not sure if this is the best solution for my use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
2 months ago
B) Build a separate Mule domain project for each API, and configure each of them to use a file on a shared file store to load the configuration information dynamically
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
3 months ago
A) Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonard
3 months ago
I agree with Edwin, it helps in centralizing the connector and configuration information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
3 months ago
I like the idea of using a shared file store to load the configuration dynamically. This way, I can easily update the configuration without having to rebuild each API.
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
2 months ago
D) Create an API proxy for each System API and share the Database connector configuration with all the API proxies via an automated policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
B) That sounds like a good approach. It would definitely make updating configurations easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
3 months ago
A) Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twana
3 months ago
Option A seems like a good idea, as it allows me to reuse the same connector configuration across multiple APIs. This way, I don't have to manage multiple configurations, which could be error-prone.
upvoted 0 times
Vicente
3 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it simplifies the management of configurations for multiple APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, using a Mule domain project for the connector and configuration is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
3 months ago
Option A seems like a good idea, as it allows me to reuse the same connector configuration across multiple APIs. This way, I don't have to manage multiple configurations, which could be error-prone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
3 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it helps in maintaining consistency and reduces the chances of errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
3 months ago
A) Build a Mule domain project, add the Database connector and configuration to it, and reference this one domain project from each System API
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, using a Mule domain project for the connector and configuration is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edwin
3 months ago
I think the best practice is to build a Mule domain project and reference it from each System API.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77