Salesforce Exam MuleSoft Platform Architect I Topic 5 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MuleSoft Platform Architect I exam

Question #: 15
Topic #: 5

[All MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions]

An organization wants to make sure only known partners can invoke the organization's APIs. To achieve this security goal, the organization wants to enforce a Client ID Enforcement policy in API Manager so that only registered partner applications can invoke the organization's APIs. In what type of API implementation does MuleSoft recommend adding an API proxy to enforce the Client ID Enforcement policy, rather than embedding the policy directly in the application's JVM?

AA Mule 3 application using APIkit

BA Mule 3 or Mule 4 application modified with custom Java code

CA Mule 4 application with an API specification

DA Non-Mule application

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

Correct Answer : A Non-Mule application

*****************************************

>> All type of Mule applications (Mule 3/ Mule 4/ with APIkit/ with Custom Java Code etc) running on Mule Runtimes support the Embedded Policy Enforcement on them.

>> The only option that cannot have or does not support embedded policy enforcement and must have API Proxy is for Non-Mule Applications.

So, Non-Mule application is the right answer.

by Mitzie at Sep 18, 2024, 06:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MuleSoft Platform Architect I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Vallie

2 months ago

Haha, good one Verda! This question is making my head spin. Maybe we should just ask the API to tell us the answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verda

2 months ago

I don't know, guys. Isn't this just a fancy way of saying 'Use the force, Luke'? I'm going to need more technical details to make a decision here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

2 months ago

I'm gonna go with B. Modifying a Mule 3 or 4 app with custom Java code gives you more flexibility to handle the policy enforcement.

upvoted 0 times

Nenita

7 days ago

That's a valid point. It really depends on the specific requirements of the organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

12 days ago

I would go with C. Using an API specification in a Mule 4 application can also be a good approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Broderick

14 days ago

Yeah, I agree. It's important to have flexibility when enforcing security policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

24 days ago

I think B is the best option too. Custom Java code can provide more control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

2 months ago

I agree with Brynn. C seems like the most straightforward way to handle this use case. Mule 4 applications with API specs are designed for this kind of thing.

upvoted 0 times