Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam OmniStudio Consultant Topic 3 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's OmniStudio Consultant exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 3
[All OmniStudio Consultant Questions]

A company implements an integration procedure that is invoked from an OmniScript. The integration procedure includes a recommend to improve performance and address users concerns

Which feature should the consultant recommend to improve performance and address users concerns?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erick
2 months ago
A) Try Catch? More like 'Try to Catch a Break' with this question! B) Batch jobs is where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
1 months ago
C) Chaining could also be a good option to improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
2 months ago
B) Batch jobs is where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
A) Try Catch? More like 'Try to Catch a Break' with this question!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
2 months ago
D) Conditions? More like 'Confusion', amirite? I'm going with the good ol' reliable B) Batch jobs.
upvoted 0 times
Elke
1 months ago
Conditions can be confusing, but they are also important for addressing users concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 months ago
I think Chaining could also be a good choice to improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
2 months ago
I agree, Batch jobs are a reliable option for addressing users concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
2 months ago
B) Batch jobs are definitely the way to go for improving performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tony
3 months ago
Chaining allows for sequential execution of integration procedures, which can improve performance and address user concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
3 months ago
Why do you think Chaining is the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Chaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
3 months ago
This is a tough one, but I'm leaning towards B) Batch jobs. Anything to avoid those angry user emails, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
3 months ago
Hmm, I was considering C) Chaining, but B) Batch jobs sounds like a more robust solution. Gotta keep those users happy!
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
1 months ago
Let's go with B) Batch jobs then. It seems like the best option for this integration procedure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to address users concerns. Batch jobs can make a big difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
2 months ago
Yeah, Batch jobs can definitely help with that. Users will appreciate the faster response times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
2 months ago
I think B) Batch jobs would be a good choice for improving performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timothy
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Batch jobs. Performing the integration in smaller batches should help improve performance and address any user concerns.
upvoted 0 times
Pauline
3 months ago
I think Chaining might also be a good option to consider for improving performance and addressing user concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
3 months ago
I agree, using batch jobs can definitely help improve performance and address user concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eric
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Batch jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77