Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam PDII Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Platform Developer II exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 1
[All Platform Developer II Questions]

Consider the following code snippet:

The Apex method is executed in an environment with a large data volume count for Accounts, and the query is performing poorly.

Which technique should the developer implement to ensure the query performs optimally, while preserving the entire result set?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mari
2 months ago
Exactly, Latrice. It's important to choose the option that is optimized for large volumes of data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
3 months ago
I agree with Mari. Using queryLocator method is specifically designed for retrieving large data volumes efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
3 months ago
But wouldn't option A, creating a formula field and filtering based on it, also help improve performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
3 months ago
I believe option D, using the Database queryLocator method, would be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
3 months ago
I think we should discuss how to optimize this query with the given options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I personally think option B) could also work by breaking down the query into two parts and joining the result sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
4 months ago
Haha, the @Future annotation in Option C? That's like trying to put a bandaid on a broken leg. Definitely not the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Nickie
3 months ago
I think breaking down the query into two individual queries and joining the result sets might be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
3 months ago
I agree, using @Future annotation won't solve the performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luann
4 months ago
I agree with Yen, combining fields with a formula field seems like a good approach to optimize the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
Option B is interesting, but I'm not sure if the additional join operation would be faster than just using queryLocator. Hmm, tough choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
4 months ago
I'm not a fan of the formula field idea in Option A. That seems like a hack and could get messy. I'd go with the queryLocator method.
upvoted 0 times
Micah
2 months ago
Great, Option D it is for optimizing the query performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
Let's go with Option D then, it's the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
2 months ago
Agreed, the queryLocator method is designed for that purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
3 months ago
It's important to optimize the query for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
3 months ago
Using the queryLocator method is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
4 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
4 months ago
I think Option A is too messy, I would go with Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tien
4 months ago
Option D looks promising. Using queryLocator to retrieve the accounts seems like a good way to handle large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) would be more efficient using the Database queryLocator method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
4 months ago
I think option A) would be the best choice, combining fields and filtering based on the formula.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77