Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam PDII Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Platform Developer II exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All Platform Developer II Questions]

Consider the following code snippet:

The Apex method is executed in an environment with a large data volume count for Accounts, and the query is performing poorly.

Which technique should the developer implement to ensure the query performs optimally, while preserving the entire result set?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Page
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go, hands down. Unless you want to spend the rest of your days waiting for that query to finish running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 months ago
I'm laughing at the idea of using the @Future annotation to solve this problem. Like, 'Hey, let's just make it asynchronous and hope for the best!' Nice try, but no.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
21 days ago
D) Use the Database queryLocator method to retrieve the accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
27 days ago
C) Annotate the method with the @Future annotation
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
1 months ago
B) Break down the query into two individual queries and join the two result sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 months ago
A) Create a formula field to combine the createdDate and RecordType value, then filter based on the formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
2 months ago
D is the obvious choice. Who wants to deal with formula fields or complex queries when you can just use the built-in queryLocator method? Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
Option D seems like the clear winner here. Anything that can help optimize the query performance while preserving the result set is a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
7 days ago
Definitely, optimizing query performance is crucial, especially with large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
8 days ago
I agree, using the Database queryLocator method seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
21 days ago
I think option D is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
27 days ago
Definitely, it's important to consider performance when dealing with large data volumes in Apex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 months ago
I agree, using the Database queryLocator method can definitely help with performance optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 months ago
Option D seems like the clear winner here. Anything that can help optimize the query performance while preserving the result set is a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
2 months ago
Hmm, I was considering option B, but the queryLocator method sounds like a better solution. It should definitely help improve the performance.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, using the Database queryLocator method seems like the best choice for optimizing the query performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
User 1: I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilford
2 months ago
I think option B could be a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
But option D might not preserve the entire result set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
3 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Using the queryLocator method to retrieve the accounts is the most efficient way to handle large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
2 months ago
Yes, option D seems like the most optimal solution for this scenario. It's important to consider performance when working with large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 months ago
I think option D is the best choice too. It's important to optimize performance when dealing with large data sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
2 months ago
I agree, option D is definitely the most efficient way to handle large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77