Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Platform Developer II Topic 5 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Platform Developer II exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 5
[All Platform Developer II Questions]

Consider the following code snippet:

The Apex method is executed in an environment with a large data volume count for Accounts, and the query is performing poorly.

Which technique should the developer implement to ensure the query performs optimally, while preserving the entire result set?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Katie
4 months ago
Wait, are we seriously even considering options A, B, or C? This is like trying to put a bandaid on a broken leg. D is the Thanos-level solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Catina
3 months ago
I agree, option D is definitely the way to go for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
3 months ago
D) Use the Database queryLocator method to retrieve the accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerri
4 months ago
Okay, let's be real here. If you're dealing with a 'large data volume', the last thing you want to do is create more work for yourself. D is the way to go, hands down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
4 months ago
I'm just going to call it - D is the only option that makes sense. This is a classic case of 'work smarter, not harder'.
upvoted 0 times
Emeline
3 months ago
It's important to optimize queries, especially with large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
4 months ago
Yeah, using the Database queryLocator method would definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
4 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most efficient solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit skeptical about B. Joining two result sets? That sounds like a recipe for disaster in a high-volume scenario. D is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I'm not sure about the others, but D definitely sounds like the most efficient approach. Gotta love those Salesforce hacks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
5 months ago
Option D is the way to go! Using queryLocator is the best way to optimize the query and handle large data volumes. This is a no-brainer.
upvoted 0 times
Josephine
3 months ago
Great, let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
3 months ago
It's definitely the most efficient way to handle the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
4 months ago
Agreed, using queryLocator is the way to go for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
4 months ago
I think option D is the most efficient solution to ensure the query performs optimally with a large data volume count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I think option D is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
4 months ago
Yeah, using the Database queryLocator method is a smart way to handle the performance issues with the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
4 months ago
I agree, option D is definitely the best choice for optimizing the query with large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorenza
5 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Option D does seem like a more efficient solution for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. Using the Database queryLocator method can handle large data volumes efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because creating a formula field can help optimize the query.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77