Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Platform Developer II Topic 6 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Platform Developer II exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 6
[All Platform Developer II Questions]

Consider the queries in the options below and the following Information:

* For these queries, assume that there are more than 200,000 Account records.

* These records Include soft-deleted records; that is, deleted records that are still in the Recycle Bin.

* There are two fields that are marked as External Id on the

Account. These fields are customer_Number_c and ERR_Key_ s.

Which two queries are optimized for large data volumes?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glenna
2 months ago
Options A and B? What is this, amateur hour? Everyone knows you gotta use those indexed fields to handle big data, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Melinda
29 days ago
Definitely, queries A and B won't cut it for handling large data volumes. We need to leverage those indexed fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 months ago
I agree, queries A and B are not optimized for big data. We should focus on indexed fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
1 months ago
Yeah, you're right. Using indexed fields is key for handling large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option D. Can someone explain why it is optimized for large data volumes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 months ago
I agree with you, Emile. Option C uses a bind variable which can handle large data volumes efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
2 months ago
I think option C and D are optimized for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
3 months ago
Ooh, tough choice, but I think I'll go with B and D. Indexing on the external ID fields seems like a good way to speed things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
3 months ago
I'm going with C and D. Using an IN clause with a list variable and filtering on the indexed IsDeleted field should be pretty efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Roy
2 months ago
C and D are definitely optimized for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
Filtering on the indexed IsDeleted field will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 months ago
I agree, using the IN clause with a list variable is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trick us with those other options. Who would use a query with a null check on Name? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Alysa
2 months ago
Agreed, those are the safer choices. Let's not fall for the bait!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
I would go with option C and D, they seem more optimized for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 months ago
Definitely, it's a trap. We need to be careful with these tricky questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
I know right! That null check on Name is a red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanda
3 months ago
Option D looks good to me. Filtering by Name and IsDeleted is a smart way to avoid the soft-deleted records and optimize the query for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
2 months ago
Yeah, filtering by Name and IsDeleted will help optimize the query for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77